Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of the examiners’ responses about the organization, quality, and evaluation of e-OSCE

From: Assessing the utility and efficacy of e-OSCE among undergraduate medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Questionnaire statements

Surgery

(N = 17)

Medicine

(N = 16)

Family Medicine

(N = 18)

Total (%)

(N = 51)

1. Overall, the tested level of knowledge and skills

 Too difficult/difficult

0

1

0

1 (2)

 Fair

14

13

16

43 (84.3)

 Too easy/easy

3

2

2

7 (13.7)

2. e-OSCE was closer to real life practice

 Strongly disagree/disagree

1

1

1

3 (5.9)

 Neutral

4

4

2

10 (19.6)

 Strongly agree/agree

12

11

15

38 (74.5)

3. e-OSCE was well-organized

 Strongly disagree/Disagree

0

0

0

0

 Neutral

0

1

0

1 (2)

 Strongly agree/agree

17

15

18

50 (98)

4. e-OSCE was conducted smoothly

 Strongly disagree/disagree

0

0

0

0

 Neutral

0

1

0

1 (2)

 Strongly agree/agree

17

15

18

50 (98)

5. I am interested to be called as an examiner in future for similar OSCEs

 Strongly disagree/disagree

0

0

0

0

 Neutral

1

2

0

3 (5.9)

 Strongly agree/agree

16

14

18

48 (94.1)

6. Preferring e-OSCE over the traditional face to face OSCE

 Strongly disagree/disagree

7

4

5

16 (31.4)

 Neutral

8

7

0

15 (29.4)

 Strongly agree/agree

2

5

13

20 (39.2)