Table 2 Students’ attitudes towards the asynchronous online lectures and the Q&A session
Statements | No. of responses | |
|---|---|---|
Agree | Disagree | |
1. Asynchronous online lecture is not different from the traditional lecture in helping you understand the lecture contents | 137 (68.5%) | 34 (17.0%) |
2. Asynchronous online lecture helps you understand the lecture contents more efficiently than the traditional lecture | 119 (60.1%) | 24 (12.1%) |
3. Asynchronous online lecture without face-to-face interaction does not cause any problems for understanding the lecture content | 139 (69.8%) | 29 (14.6%) |
4. Asynchronous online lecture is more convenient than the traditional lecture | 152 (76.0%) | 24 (12.0%) |
5. Asynchronous online lecture facilitates the management of your own schedule better than the traditional lecture | 112 (56.3%) | 54 (27.1%) |
6. The Q&A session promotes your understanding of cardiovascular physiology contents | 122 (63.2%) | 12 (6.2%) |
7. The Q&A session after a series of asynchronous online lectures with voluntary participation is satisfactory | 140 (72.9%) | 6 (3.1%) |
8. For the next year, teaching by asynchronous online lecture is preferred over the traditional lecture | 99 (50.5%) | 57 (29.1%) |