Skip to main content

Table 2 Fellowship interview season data

From: Obstetrics and gynecology resident perception of virtual fellowship interviews

N = 75

N(%)

Applicant Residency Program background

 Percentage of residents from your program who pursue fellowship:

   < 25%

13 (17.3)

  25-50%

25 (33.3)

  51-75%

21 (28.0)

   > 75%

16 (21.3)

 Which fellowships does your institution offer?*

  Family Planning

24 (32.0)

  Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

37 (49.3)

  Gynecologic Oncology

47 (62.7)

  Maternal-Fetal Medicine

57 (76.0)

  Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

23 (30.7)

  Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

5 (6.7)

  Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

37 (49.3)

  None

6 (8.0)

Application

 Which fellowship did you apply for?

  Family Planning

9 (12.0)

  Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

3 (4.0)

  Gynecologic Oncology

19 (25.3)

  Maternal-Fetal Medicine

29 (38.7)

  Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

8 (10.7)

  Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

1 (1.3)

  Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility

6 (8.0)

 Did you Match in the fellowship you applied for?

  Yes

27 (36.0)

  N/A; awaiting Match results

48 (64.0)

 How many programs did you apply to?

  < 10

9 (12.0)

  10-20

14 (18.7)

  21-30

20 (26.7)

  31-40

10 (13.3)

  41-50

11 (14.7)

   > 50

11 (14.7)

 Virtual interviews affect number of programs applied to

  Applied to fewer

1 (1.3)

  Applied to just as many

57 (76.0)

  Applied to few more

14 (18.7)

  Applied to significantly more

3 (4.0)

Interviews

 How many programs did you interview at

  1-5

7 (9.3)

  5-10

12 (16.0)

  11-20

37 (49.3)

  21-30

18 (24.0)

  31-40

1 (1.3)

 Virtual interviews affect number of programs interviewed at

  Interviewed at fewer

3 (4.0)

  Interviewed at just as many

23 (30.7)

  Interviewed at few more

31 (41.3)

  Interviewed at significantly more

18 (24.0)

 Did you interview at more programs because:*

  Minimal cost accepting additional interviews

44 (58.7)

  More difficulty matching due to virtual interviews

34 (45.3)

  Other

7 (9.3)

 How many programs did you rank

  1-5

11 (14.7)

  5-10

11 (14.7)

  11-20

41 (54.7)

  21-30

11 (14.67)

  31-40

1 (1.3)

 How much did you save on travel this interview season

  < $500

6 (8.0)

  $500-$1000

2 (2.7)

  $1000-$3000

16 (21.3)

  $3000-$5000

15 (20.0)

  $5000-$7000

12 (16.0)

   > $7000

24 (32.0)

 How many working days did you have to find coverage for

  1-5

32 (42.7)

  6-10

28 (37.3)

  11-15

12 (16.0)

  16-20

3 (4.0)

 How would this be different if attended in-person interviews

(n = 74)

  Would’ve needed fewer days covered

1 (1.4)

  Would’ve needed same number of days covered

2 (2.7)

  Would’ve needed more days covered

71 (95.9)

 Did you have to use vacation days for interviews

  Yes

27 (36.0)

  No

48 (64.0)

 Did you have prior experience interviewing on virtual platform

  Yes

0 (−-)

  No

75 (100.0)

Perception of the program

 Pre-interview materials

  Very helpful

31 (41.3)

  Somewhat helpful

37 (49.3)

  Neutral

3 (4.0)

  Not very helpful

3 (4.0)

  N/A

1 (1.3)

 Program brochure

  Very helpful

16 (21.3)

  Somewhat helpful

34 (45.3)

  Neutral

14 (18.7)

  Not very helpful

4 (5.3)

  Not helpful at all

1 (1.3)

  N/A

6 (8.0)

 Program video

  Very helpful

34 (45.3)

  Somewhat helpful

31 (41.3)

  Neutral

7 (9.3)

  Not helpful at all

1 (1.3)

  N/A

2 (2.7)

Program website

  Very helpful

25 (33.3)

  Somewhat helpful

37 (49.3)

  Neutral

9 (12.0)

  Not very helpful

2 (2.7)

  Not helpful at all

2 (2.7)

 Program reputation

  Very helpful

36 (48.0)

  Somewhat helpful

31 (41.3)

  Neutral

7 (9.3)

  Not very helpful

1 (1.3)

 Program social media

  Very helpful

8 (10.7)

  Somewhat helpful

21 (28.0)

  Neutral

29 (38.7)

  Not very helpful

8 (10.7)

  Not helpful at all

4 (5.3)

  N/A

5 (6.7)

 Personalized interview schedule

  Very helpful

36 (48.0)

  Somewhat helpful

30 (40.0)

  Neutral

3 (4.0)

  Not very helpful

3 (4.0)

  N/A

3 (4.0)

 Pre-interview “social” or “happy hour”

  Very helpful

15 (20.0)

  Somewhat helpful

31 (41.3)

  Neutral

10 (13.3)

  Not very helpful

6 (8.0)

  Not helpful at all

6 (8.0)

  N/A

7 (9.3)

 Interview day program overview information

  Very helpful

45 (60.0)

  Somewhat helpful

25 (33.3)

  Neutral

3 (4.0)

  Not very helpful

1 (1.3)

  N/A

1 (1.3)

 Interview day interviews

  Very helpful

43 (57.3)

  Somewhat helpful

30 (40.0)

  Neutral

1 (1.3)

  Not very helpful

1 (1.3)

 Fellows Q&A

(n = 74)

  Very helpful

44 (59.5)

  Somewhat helpful

24 (32.4)

  Neutral

5 (6.8)

  N/A

1 (1.4)

 Informational video/virtual tour

  Very helpful

19 (25.3)

  Somewhat helpful

37 (49.3)

  Neutral

12 (16.0)

  Not very helpful

5 (6.7)

  N/A

2 (2.7)

Preference with specifics aspects of virtual interview

 What virtual interview platform did you prefer*

  ZOOM

75 (100)

  WEBEX

7 (9.3)

  Microsoft Teams

9 (12.0)

  Eposterboard

3 (4.0)

  Other

1 (1.3)

 For virtual interviews, would you prefer interviewing with

  Individual interviewer

66 (88.0)

  Panel of interviewers

9 (12.0)

 What is your preferred length of virtual interview

(n = 75)

  15 min

23 (30.7)

  18 min

8 (10.7)

  20 min

42 (56.0)

  25 min

2 (2.7)

 Preferred number of interviews within an interview day

  Mean (SD)

4.9 (0.9)

  Median (Min-Max)

5 (3-8)

  IQR (Q1-Q3)

(4-5)

 Preferred amount of break time between virtual interviews

  2 min

7 (9.3)

  5 min

57 (76.0)

  10 min

11 (14.7)

 In between interviews, prefer meeting group or time away?

  Group break room

3 (4.0)

  Time to myself

28 (37.3)

  Combination of group break room and time to myself

44 (58.7)

  1. *Does not sum to 100%