Table 2 Satisfaction of students with the seminars, and impact on their professional practice (N = 580)
From: Assessing the implementation of community-based learning in public health: a mixed methods approach
Level 1 of Kirkpatrick’s model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very N (%) | Quite N (%) | Not very N (%) | Not at all N (%) | No answer N (%) | |
General satisfaction | 145 (25.0) | 335 (57.7) | 81 (14.0) | 19 (3.3) | 0 (0) |
Satisfaction for: | |||||
1. Seminar facilitation | 271 (46.7) | 246 (42.4) | 36 (6.2) | 7 (1.2) | 20 (3.5) |
2. Exchanges between participants | 340 (58.6) | 208 (35.9) | 11 (1.9) | 2 (0.3) | 19 (3.3) |
3. Documentation provided | 182 (31.4) | 303 (52.2) | 70 (12.1) | 7 (1.2) | 18 (3.1) |
4. Group atmosphere | 406 (70.0) | 150 (25.9) | 7 (1.2) | 0 (0.0) | 17 (2.9) |
5. Atmosphere generated by the pair of trainers | 392 (67.6) | 159 (27.4) | 23 (4.0) | 4 (0.7) | 2 (0.3) |
Totally N (%) | In part N (%) | Weakly N (%) | Not at all N (%) | No answer N (%) | |
Ability of interactive seminars to meet student expectations | 104 (17.9) | 331 (57.1) | 96 (16.6) | 31 (5.3) | 18 (3.1) |
Level 3 of Kirkpatrick’s model | |||||
Great N (%) | Some N (%) | Weak N (%) | Not at all N (%) | No answer N (%) | |
Impact on future practise | 55 (9.5) | 196 (33.8) | 213 (36.7) | 77 (13.3) | 39 (6.7) |