Table 1 Results of the critical appraisal of the articles included in the systematic review
Citation | Did the study/project address a specific question/aim? | Was the study design explained? | Did the paper clarify if the study/project was funded? If yes, by whom? | Was the origin of the study/project stated? | Was the nature/background of the innovation illustrated? | Was the context of the study/project sufficiently described? | Were the participants in the study/project elucidated? | Was the implementation process explained? | Did the authors include sufficient cases / settings / observations so that conceptual rather than statistical generalisations could be made? | Was the data collection process systematic, thorough and auditable? | Were data analysed systematically and rigorously? Were sufficient data presented? | Were the main results stated with enough details? | Did the authors draw a clear link between data and explanation (theory)? | Were the authors’ positions and roles clearly explained and the resulting biases considered? | Was the declaration of interest stated? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Van Lierop et al. (2019) [51] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Unclear | No | Yes | No | Yes |
RodrÃguez et al. (2019) [52] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Van Gessel et al. (2018) [1] | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Imafuku et al. (2018) [53] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Milot et al. (2015) [54] | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NAa | NA | NA | NA | No | No | Yes |
Sanborn H. (2016) [30] | Yes | Unclear | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | No | No | Yes |
Horsley et al. (2016) [55] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | No |
Meche et al. (2015) [56] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NA | NA | NA | NA | No | No | Yes |
Waggie M. and Laattoe N. (2014) [57] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | NA | NA | NA | NA | No | No | Yes |
Hinderer K. and Joyner R. (2014) [58] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
Vanier et al. (2013) [45] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | No |
Holland et al. (2013) [46] | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | Yes |
Doucet et al. (2013) [47] | Yes | Yes | No | No | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | Yes |
Pardue K. (2013) [48] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | Yes |
Olenick et al. (2011) [49] | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | NA | NA | NA | NA | Yes | No | Yes |
Bilodeau et al. (2010) [50] | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |