Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive Statistics for Clinical Empathy and Well-Being (N = 132)

From: The direct and indirect effects of clinical empathy on well-being among pre-medical students: a structural equation model approach

Construct

Properties

Mean (SD)

95% C.I.

Clinical Empathy (JSE-S Version)

20 items, a = .80, range: 20–140, 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree

5.52 (.58)

5.42–5.62

 Perspective-Taking

6 items, a = .74, range: 6–42, 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree

5.84 (.72)

5.72–6.97

 Compassionate Care

4 items, a = .64, range: 4–28, 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree

5.89 (.86)

5.75–6.04

 Standing in Patients’ Shoes

2 items, a = .74, range: 2–14, 1 = Strongly disagree to 7 = Strongly agree

4.70 (1.25)

4.49–4.92

Depression (CES-D-10)

10 items, a = .87, range:10–40, 1 = rarely or none of the time to 4 = most or all of the time

1.93 (.64)

1.82–2.05

Burnout (MBI-SS)

14 items, a = .88, range: 0–84, 0 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree

2.18 (1.08)

1.10–2.37

 Emotional Exhaustion

5 items, a = .92, 0–30, 0 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree

3.27 (1.59)

2.10–3.55

 Poor Academic Efficacya

6 items, a = .83, range: 0–36, 0 = strongly disagree to6 = strongly agree

1.56 (1.12)

1.37–1.76

 Cynicism

3 items, a = .86, range: 0–18, 0 = strongly disagree to 6 = strongly agree

1.92 (1.72)

1.63–2.22

  1. aThe Academic Efficacy sub-scale was re-named “Poor Academic Efficacy” to reflect that some items were reverse-coded and so higher values reflect more burnout