Skip to main content

Table 1 Selection criteria for the studies in this systematic review using SPIDER (n = 44)

From: Preserving professional identities, behaviors, and values in digital professionalism using social networking sites; a systematic review

Variables

Inclusion criteria

Sample

- Health professionals

-Medical and nursing undergraduate and postgraduate students and/or residents

-Physicians and fellows

-Medical educators or school administrators

-Medical school websites

-Respondents from medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, and nursing

Phenomenon of Interest

Digital professionalism, Professional behaviors, attitudes and identity in digital world

Design

Questionnaire/Survey

Interview

Focus group

Observational studies

Ethnography

Content analysis

Evaluation

Views

Experiences

Opinions/Attitudes/Perceptions/Beliefs/Ideas

Knowledge/Understanding

Behaviours

Research type

-Qualitative

-Quantitative

-Mixed method

  1. S Sample; PI Phenomenon of Interest; D Design; E Evaluation; R Research type