Skip to main content

Table 1 Correlation between all assessment methods and electronic assessment tools and gold-standard assessment

From: Comparison of electronic versus conventional assessment methods in ophthalmology residents; a learner assessment scholarship study

  

me-OSCE

e-PMP

attendance

Prof/ 360a

Logbook

Journal

Club

participation

OPD b

Research skills

MCQ

OSCE

me-OSCE

Correlation

P-value

1

0.147

0.494

0.378

0.069

−0.008

0.971

0.021

0.923

0.321

0.278

0.241

0.256

−0.001

0.996

0.033

0.877

0.332

0.112

e-PMP

Correlation

P-value

0.147

0.494

1

−0.243

0.253

0.499

0.013

−0.519

0.009

0.548

0.033

0.492

0.015

0.528

0.008

0.669

0.000

0.625

0.001

Prof/360a

Correlation

P-value

−0.008

0.971

0.499

0.013

−0.184

0.391

1

−0.134

0.531

0.815

0.003

0.753

0.000

0.559

0.004

0.341

0.103

0.486

0.016

  1. ashortened of professionalism/ 360-degree assessment method. bshortened of Outpatient active participation method. Underlined numbers are significant (P-value < 0.05)
  2. Correlation between all assessment methods and electronic assessment tools; due to Due to extensive, repetitive, and precise evaluation applied in professionalism/360-degree’s assessment, it was considered as “gold standard”; Eventually, for comparison of results with the gold standard assessment tool, a correlation was calculated between gold standard assessment tool and all other methods. Underlined numbers present statistically significant correlations