Skip to main content

Table 4 Kruskal-Wallis tests of the peer feedback pre- and post-measures

From: The effect of peer modelling and discussing modelled feedback principles on medical students’ feedback skills: a quasi-experimental study

 

Pre-intervention

Post-intervention

Functions

  

Positive evaluation

H(2) = 0.75, p = .69

 H(2) = 6.33, p = .04*

Negative evaluation

H(2) = 0.02, p = .99

 H(2) = 2.21, p = .33

Explanation for evaluation

H(2) = 1.08, p = .58

 H(2) = 5.25, p = .07

Revision

H(2) = 5.72, p = .06

 H(2) = 1.25, p = .54

Explanation for revision

H(2) = 4.24, p = .12

 H(2) = 0.63, p = .73

Analysis

H(2) = 1.08, p = .58

 H(2) = 4.51, p = .11

Aspects

  

Content

H(2) = 1.36, p = .51

 H(2) = 4.48, p = .11

Structure

H(2) = 0.29, p = .87

 H(2) = 0.07, p = .97

Style

H(2) = 0.4.30, p = .12

 H(2) = 0.31, p =. 86

  1. * Significant at p < .05