Skip to main content

Table 4 Kruskal-Wallis tests of the peer feedback pre- and post-measures

From: The effect of peer modelling and discussing modelled feedback principles on medical students’ feedback skills: a quasi-experimental study

  Pre-intervention Post-intervention
Functions   
Positive evaluation H(2) = 0.75, p = .69  H(2) = 6.33, p = .04*
Negative evaluation H(2) = 0.02, p = .99  H(2) = 2.21, p = .33
Explanation for evaluation H(2) = 1.08, p = .58  H(2) = 5.25, p = .07
Revision H(2) = 5.72, p = .06  H(2) = 1.25, p = .54
Explanation for revision H(2) = 4.24, p = .12  H(2) = 0.63, p = .73
Analysis H(2) = 1.08, p = .58  H(2) = 4.51, p = .11
Aspects   
Content H(2) = 1.36, p = .51  H(2) = 4.48, p = .11
Structure H(2) = 0.29, p = .87  H(2) = 0.07, p = .97
Style H(2) = 0.4.30, p = .12  H(2) = 0.31, p =. 86
  1. * Significant at p < .05