Table 5 Student’s perceived satisfaction on wire-bending demonstration after first (T0) and last (T1) wire-bending tasks (Lower scores indicate higher satisfaction)
Feedback section | Time | Cohort | Mean (SD) N = 20 | p-value |
Infrastructure and materials provided | T0 | LD | 2.5 (1.1) | 0.303^ |
FC | 2.5 (0.6) | |||
T1 | LD | 2.9 (0.9) | 0.000^ | |
FC | 1.8 (0.6) | |||
Demonstration method (live / video) | T0 | LD | 1.8 (0.6) | 0.000* |
FC | 2.8 (0.8) | |||
T1 | LD | 2.0 (0.6) | 0.003* | |
FC | 2.7 (0.7) | |||
Teaching method | T0 | LD | 2.0 (0.6) | 0.708^ |
FC | 1.9 (0.5) | |||
T1 | LD | 2.0 (0.6) | 0.466^ | |
FC | 2.2 (0.6) | |||
Wire-bending task | T0 | LD | 2.3 (0.8) | 0.005* |
FC | 3.0 (0.6) | |||
T1 | LD | 2.6 (0.7) | 0.436^ | |
FC | 2.8 (0.6) | |||
Efficiency of lecturer and technician during the classroom activity | T0 | LD | 1.7 (0.5) | 0.750^ |
FC | 1.7 (0.6) | |||
T1 | LD | 1.8 (0.4) | 0.198^ | |
FC | 1.6 (0.5) | |||
Overall | T0 | LD | 1.9 (0.5) | 0.367^ |
FC | 2.0 (0.5) | |||
T1 | LD | 1.9 (0.3) | 0.011^ | |
FC | 2.4 (0.7) |