Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive analyses of individual questions to global rating

From: Exploring how differently patients and clinical tutors see the same consultation: building evidence for inclusion of real patient feedback in medical education

 

Patient Assessment

Clinical tutor Assessment

Na

Rangeb

Mean (SD)

Na

Rangeb

Mean (SD)

Q1c

221

1–4

3.05 (0.85)

222

1–4

2.58 (0.69)

Q2

214

0–4

3.02 (0.77)

220

1–4

2.53 (0.66)

Q3

221

0–4

3.05 (0.76)

220

1–4

2.53 (0.65)

Q4

221

0–4

2.67 (0.85)

222

0–4

2.10 (0.67)

Q5

222

1–4

2.80 (0.91)

221

0–4

2.21 (0.74)

Q6

196

1–4

3.13 (0.88)

215

0–4

2.48 (0.69)

Q7

222

1–4

3.40 (0.79)

218

1–4

2.68 (0.69)

Q8

197

0–4

2.86 (0.65)

212

0–4

2.29 (0.58)

Q9

221

1–4

3.18 (0.88)

222

1–4

2.53 (0.72)

Q10

219

1–4

2.98 (0.76)

222

0–4

2.29 (0.68)

  1. aMissing data occurred as a result of raters perceiving that they are unable to make an assessment for a particular item, based on the consultation
  2. bAssessment grades: Poor (0), Fair (1), Good (2), Very good (3), Excellent (4)
  3. cAssessment question text incorporated in Table 2