From: Postgraduate ethics training programs: a systematic scoping review
Teaching of ethics | ||
PICOS | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
 Population | Junior doctors, residents, senior residents, registrars and or medical officers undergoing postgraduate training | Undergraduate and postgraduate medical students Allied health specialties such as Pharmacy, Dietetics, Chiropractic, Midwifery, Podiatry, Speech Therapy, Occupational and Physiotherapy Non-medical specialties such as Clinical and Translational Science, Alternative and Traditional Medicine, Veterinary, Dentistry |
 Intervention | Practices in nurturing and teaching ethics of doctors |  |
 Comparison | Comparisons of the various practices (approaches, modalities, processes, objectives, motivations, challenges, facilitating characteristics/resources) |  |
 Outcome | Approaches, modalities, processes, objectives, motivations, challenges, facilitating characteristics/resources in nurturing and teaching ethics Impact of teaching ethics on host organisation, assessors, and assessments |  |
 Study Design | Articles in English or translated to English All study designs including: o Mixed methods research, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and descriptive papers Year of Publication: 1 January 1990–31 December 2019 Databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC | Grey Literature / electronic and print information not controlled by commercial publishing Articles focusing on non-human subjects |
Assessing of ethics | ||
 Population | Junior doctors, residents, senior residents, registrars and or medical officers undergoing postgraduate training | Undergraduate and postgraduate medical students Allied health specialties such as Pharmacy, Dietetics, Chiropractic, Midwifery, Podiatry, Speech Therapy, Occupational and Physiotherapy Non-medical specialties such as Clinical and Translational Science, Alternative and Traditional Medicine, Veterinary, Dentistry |
 Intervention | Practices in assessing ethics of postgraduate doctors |  |
 Comparison | Comparisons of the various practices (approaches, modalities, processes, objectives, motivations, challenges, facilitating characteristics/resources) |  |
 Outcome | Approaches, modalities, processes, objectives, motivations, challenges, facilitating characteristics/resources in nurturing and teaching ethics Impact of teaching ethics on host organisation, assessors, and learners |  |
 Study design | Articles in English or translated to English All study designs including: Mixed methods research, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, and descriptive papers Year of Publication: 1 January 1990–31 December 2019 Databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC | Grey Literature/electronic and print information not controlled by commercial publishing Articles focusing on non-human subjects |