Skip to main content

Table 1 Mapping study objectives to education and implementation outcomes

From: A retrospective quantitative implementation evaluation of Safer Opioid Prescribing, a Canadian continuing education program

Study Questions

Moore et al.’s (26) framework Level

Implementation outcome

1) Who were the participants in the program?

Sub-questions: Were family physicians well-represented? Were prescribers from rural and remote communities well-represented? What proportion of participations had involvement with the medical regulator with respect to controlled substance prescribing?

Participation

(LEVEL 1)

Reach

2) What was the completion rate of the program?

Sub-questions: Which participants were more or less likely to complete the program?

Participation

(LEVEL 1)

Dose

3) Did participants note any significant bias in the delivery of the program?

Satisfaction

(LEVEL 2)

Fidelity

4) Was adequate time provided for active learning?

Sub-questions: How did ratings of active learning change with respect to cohort size?

Satisfaction (LEVEL 2)

Fidelity

5) Was the program relevant to clinical practice?

Sub-questions: How did ratings of relevance to practice change with respect to cohort size?

Satisfaction

(LEVEL 2)

Participant responsiveness