Skip to main content

Table 2 Knowledge of endobronchial anatomy and navigational skills by time of measurement and group

From: Man or machine? Impact of tutor-guided versus simulator-guided short-time bronchoscopy training on students learning outcomes

 

pre

post

p-valuea

Cohens’ db

Knowledge of endobronchial anatomy

Segments correctly identified on 1st attempt (all)

4.38 (1.77)

12.04 (5.13)

< 0.001

2.21

 Simulator-guided

4.36 (1.66)

10.88 (4.83)

0.07

0.63

 Tutor-guided

4.39 (1.81)

13.11 (5.26)

Segments correctly identified on any attempt (all)

5.58 (2.34)

13.83 (5.09)

< 0.001

2.15

 Simulator-guided

5.56 (2.29)

12.8 (5.06)

0.105

0.52

 Tutor-guided

5.61 (2.42)

14.78 (5.06)

Segments skipped (all)

22.45 (2.31)

14.63 (4.72)

< 0.001

2.23

 Simulator-guided

22.48 (2.26)

15.48 (4.69)

0.14

0.46

 Tutor-guided

22.43 (2.41)

13.85 (4.69)

Navigational skills

% time in mid-lumen

44.04 (12.66)

37.63 (12.18)

0.004

0.52

 Simulator-guided

43.68 (12.52)

37.52 (16.37)

0.998

0.04

 Tutor-guided

44.36 (13.02)

37.74 (13.85)

Scope wall contacts

15.36 (8.05)

23.63 (8.68)

< 0.001

0.99

 Simulator-guided

16.36 (7.54)

23.0 (9.04)

0.36

0.37

 Tutor-guided

14.5 (8.53)

24.26 (8.47)

  1. abold for comparison between pre- and post-assessment, normal for interaction between groups and time of measurement
  2. bbold for comparison between pre- and post-assessment, normal for difference in gain/loss between groups