Table 4 Results of the medical students’ satisfaction with the illness script workshop
No | Statement | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | I gained a good understanding of concepts in the clinical reasoning field | 72 (72%) | 20 (20%) | 6 (6%) | 2 (2%) |
2 | The workshop encouraged me to improve my clinical reasoning ability in the future | 69 (69%) | 20 (20%) | 8 (8%) | 3 (3%) |
3 | The learning objectives of the workshop were clearly defined. | 72 (72%) | 26 (26%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (2%) |
4 | The amount of material delivered in the workshop was reasonable. | 70 (70%) | 23 (23%) | 6 (6%) | 1 (1%) |
5 | The level of difficulty of the workshop was appropriate. | 63 (63%) | 24 (24%) | 12 (12%) | 1 (1%) |
6 | The program was a good learning experience for me | 74 (74%) | 16 (16%) | 9 (9%) | 1 (1%) |
7 | The illness script model was useful for improving my clinical reasoning skills. | 61 (61%) | 23 (23%) | 15 (15%) | 1 (1%) |
8 | This type of education emphasized learning | 80 (80%) | 12 (12%) | 7 (7%) | 1 (1%) |
9 | The tutor gave us appropriate feedback | 82 (82%) | 14 (14%) | 3 (3%) | 1 (1%) |
10 | The “thinking aloud” method helped improve my clinical reasoning skills. | 56 (56%) | 22 (22%) | 16 (16%) | 6 (6%) |
11 | The workshop was boring and wasted my time | 4 (4%) | 10 (10%) | 86 (86%) | 0 (0%) |
12 | The students’ participation was encouraged | 74 (74%) | 23 (23%) | 3 (3%) | 0 (0%) |
13 | I recommend this type of teaching for other sign and symptoms | 76 (76%) | 18 (18%) | 4 (4%) | 2 (2%) |
14 | Overall, I am satisfied with the course. | 78 (78%) | 14 (14%) | 6 (6%) | 2 (2%) |