Table 2 The descriptive statistics for the students’ attitude regarding effectiveness of mobile learning
Item No. | Questionnaire indicator | Strongly agree N % | Agree N % | Uncer- tain N % | Disagree N % | Strongly disagree N % | Average | Stand- ard devia- tion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | Mobile learning can be an effective method of learning as it can give immediate support. | 17 54.8% | 12 38.7% | 2 6.5% | 0 0 | 0 0 | 4.48 | 0.58 |
Q2 | Mobile learning will bring new opportunities of learning | 14 45.2% | 15 48.4% | 2 6.5% | 0 0 | 0 0 | 4.41 | 0.64 |
Q3 | Mobile learning will be more flexible method of learning as it can be done anytime, anywhere | 19 61.3% | 9 29% | 3 9.7% | 0 0 | 0 0 | 4.48 | 0.70 |
Q4 | Mobile learning will improve communication between student and teacher. | 9 29% | 13 41.9% | 6 19.4% | 3 9.7% | 0 0 | 3.85 | 0.99 |
Mobile learning cannot be used for learning due to: | ||||||||
Q5 | expenses involved in Mobile learning | 3 9.7% | 10 32.3% | 13 41.9% | 5 16.1% | 4 2.1 | 2.7 | 0.87 |
Q6 | poor networking in the city | 18 58.1% | 11 35.5% | 2 6.5% | 0 0 | 0 0 | 1.48 | 0.64 |
Q7 | unavailability of mobile phones with a larger number of students | 2 6.5% | 5 16.1% | 14 45.2% | 6 19.4% | 4 12.9% | 3.19 | 1.14 |