Skip to main content

Table 1 Results

From: Revisiting the trajectory of medical students’ empathy, and impact of gender, specialty preferences and nationality: a systematic review

Title

Author, year published

Country

Study objective

Study design

Sample size (response rate)

Scales1

Results

Comments on study quality

A latent growth model suggests that empathy of medical students does not decline over time [32]

Costa et al. 2013 [32]

Portugal

Investigate empathy throughout medical school

Longitudinal

77

JSPE-S NEO-Five-Factor Inventory

- Non-significant positive evolution in empathy scores across three time points in Portuguese undergraduate medical students that cover the preclinical/clinical transmission - A significant decline in empathy was found in females in the transition period from pre-clinical to the clinical phase of education

- Single-institution survey - Small sample size

A Quantitative Study of Empathy in Pakistani Medical Students:

A Multicentered Approach [33]

Tariq et al. 2017 [33]

Pakistan

Investigate empathy among medical students in the context of patient care

Cross-sectional

1453

JSPE-S

- A statistically significant difference in JSPE scores for the 5 medical year groups - No significant difference in the JSPE scores for males and females - No significant difference in the JSPE scores across specialty preference

- Multi-center survey - Response rate unspecified

An exploration of changes in cognitive and emotional empathy among medical students in the Caribbean [34]

Youssef et al. 2014 [34]

Trinidad &Tobago

Investigate the empathy profile across all five years of training in a medical school

Cross-sectional

667 (67%)

JSPE-STEQ RMET

- Highest scores were observed when students enter medical school and the lowest scores among third-year students - Female mean scores were significantly higher than male - No significant effects of ethnicity or specialisation

- Single-institution survey - Highest response rate at year one

Characterizing changes in student empathy throughout medical school [35]

Chen et al. 2012 [35]

USA

Investigate long-term trajectories of empathy among medical students

Longitudinal

1162 (81%)

JSPE-S

- Empathy levels increased from the beginning of medical school until the end of preclinical years, followed by a decline in the third year of medical school that persisted throughout graduation - Females showed significantly higher empathy levels than males

- Single-institution survey - Varying response rate (54–99%)

Clinical empathy in medical students in India measured using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy–Student Version [36]

Chatterjee et al. 2017

India

Investigate clinical empathy and the various associated factors in medical students spanning 4 years of undergraduate study

Cross-sectional

418 (69.7%)

JSPE-S

- Mean empathy scores fell from the first to the third semester, then more or less plateaued, and then rose again in the seventh semester - Females having significantly higher empathy scores than males

- Single-institution survey

Comparative cross-sectional study of empathy among first year and final year medical students in Jimma University, Ethiopia: Steady state of the heart and opening of the eyes [37]

Dehning, S. et al. 2012

Ethiopia

Investigate whether empathy increases with medical training and identify the socio-demographic background of medical students influencing their empathy levels

Cross-sectional

237

BEES RMET

- No significant difference in emotional empathy between first-year and final year medical students - Higher cognitive empathy among final year students as compared to first-year students - Males scored lower mean cognitive and emotional empathy scores than females

- Single-institution survey - No response rate - Instruments not validated

Comparing a Self-Administered Measure of Empathy with Observed Behaviour Among Medical Students [38]

Chen et al. 2010

USA

Investigate the relationship between self-administered, JSPE-S, and observed empathy

Longitudinal

2nd year: 163 (97.6%) 3rd year: 159 (98.1%)

JSPE-SOSCE-evaluation

- Second-year students had higher JSPE-scores compared to third-year students, but the average observed empathy score for second-year students was lower than the observed empathy scores for third-year students - A trend towards a decline in measured empathy with increased clinical training with a self-administered instrument, but an improvement in observed empathy among those clinically experienced (i.e. third-year-students)

- Single-institution survey - A small number of OSCE participants

Comparison of empathy score among medical students in both basic and clinical levels [21]

Khademalhosseini et al. 2014

Iran

Investigate and compare the empathy scores of medical students between basic sciences and clinical levels

Cross-sectional

260

JSPE-S

- Empathy scores among medical students decreased by the increase in their educational years - Females had higher mean empathy students than males

- Single-institution survey - Response rate unspecified

Comparison of Empathy Skills and Conflict Tendency in Preclinical and Clinical Phase Turkish Medical Students: a Cross-Sectional Study [23]

Atay et al. 2014

Turkey

Investigate the differences and relations of empathy and conflict tendencies of medical students in preclinical and clinical phase

Cross-sectional

186 (55%)

Empathic Skill Scale B Form Conflict Tendency Scale

- A significantly higher score of empathy skills in last year medical students as compared to first-year and fourth-year students - No significant differences in empathy skill scores among males and females

- Single-institution survey - Low response rate

Cross sectional assessment of empathy among undergraduates from a medical college [39]

Shashikumar et al. 2014

India

Investigate empathy among medical students of various years

Cross-sectional

488 (75%)

JSPE-S

- Empathy declines during medical school, but only significant when comparing first-year and seventh-year - Significantly higher empathy score in females compared to males - No significant differences in empathy scores among different groups of specialty preferences

- Single-institution survey - A low number of responders in 7th semester

Decline of empathy among medical students: Dehumanization or useful coping process? [40]

Triffaux et al. 2019

Belgium

Investigate empathy decline among Belgian medical students across the different years of education and compare the level of empathy with commercial students

Cross-sectional

1353 medical students and 249 commercial students

The Basic Empathy Scale

- A significant decline in empathy scores among medical students - Significantly higher empathy scores among females in comparison with males - Significant higher empathy scores on all aspects of empathy for medical students compared to commercial students

- Single-institution survey - Unspecified response-rate

Empathic orientation among medical students from three universities in Barranquilla, Colombia and one university in the Dominican Republic [41]

Diaz Narvaez et al. 2014

Colombia The Dominican Republic

Investigate and compare empathic orientation in medical students from four universities

Cross-sectional

Universidad del Norte: n = 345 (40.16%) Universidad San Martín, n = 283 (57.4%) Universidad Libre, n = 695 (61.56%). Universidad Central del Este, n = 515 (60.38%)

JSPE-S

- Empathy values reduced as courses advanced in all schools analysed - No differences between genders

- Multi-center survey - Lack of consistency between text and table presentation of results

Empathy among undergraduate medical students: A multi-centre cross-sectional comparison of students beginning and approaching the end of their course [42]

Quince et al. 2016

United Kingdom (UK) New Zealand (NZ)

Investigate empathy among students at the beginning and end of undergraduate medical training in multiple medical schools

Cross-sectional

1139 UK: 1st/2nd year: 652 (54.9%) Final year: 487 (48.1) NZ 1st year: 721 (24%) Final year: 476 (15.2%)

JSPE-SIRI

- No significant differences in empathy scores between students starting and approaching the end of their course - Females had significantly higher empathy scores than males

- Multi-center survey - A low response rate in NZ final year

Empathy differences by gender and specialty preference in medical students: a study in Brazil [43]

Santos et al. 2016

Brazil

Investigate medical students’ empathy and to examine empathy differences by students’ socio-demographic characteristics, including gender, and specialty preference

Cross-sectional

226 (70.6%)

JSPE-S

- Consistently high scores of empathy in medical students enrolled in all levels of training - Higher empathy scores in females and students who intend to pursue people-oriented specialties

- Single-institution survey

Empathy in Chinese medical students: psychometric characteristics and differences by gender and year of medical education [44]

Wen et al. 2013

China

Investigate the psychometric properties of the JSPE-S among a sample of Chinese medical students and investigate the primary levels of empathy of the medical students and analyse group differences

Cross-sectional

753 (83.5%)

JSPE-S

- Statistically significant differences in empathy scores among medical students in different years of medical school. The first-year students had the lowest empathy scores and the fourth-year students had the highest empathy scores. - Significant higher empathy scores among females

- Single-institution survey - Applied mean data as a substitution for missing data

Empathy in Chinese eight-year medical program students: differences by school year, educational stage, and future career preference [45]

Li et al. 2018

China

Investigate the factor structure of a Chinese version of the JSPE-S with Chinese students, as well as to assess the differences in empathy scores

Cross-sectional

442 (83%)

JSPE-S

- A statistically significant difference in the mean JSPE-S scores in different school years. There was a difference between fifth- and sixth-year students (109.1 vs. 101.2). The seventh-year students had significant differences in empathy scores when compared to the first-year students (99.5 vs.107.6) and seventh-year students differed from fifth-year students (99.5 vs. 109.1) - No significant differences in empathy scores among females and males - A statistically significant difference in empathy mean score according to future career preference. Students who preferred not to become doctors had lower empathy than those who did prefer to become doctors

- Single-institution survey - Participants among the top level of medical students in China

Empathy in Iranian medical students: A comparison by age, gender, academic performance and specialty preferences [46]

Benabbas et al. 2016

Iran

Investigate self-reported empathy and its alteration during medical school in Iranian medical students

Cross-sectional

459 (91.8%)

JSPE-S

- The mean score of empathy among interns was significantly lower than both trainees and preclinical students - No statistically significant differences in empathy scores between genders - Empathy score was not related to specialty choice

- Single-institution survey

Empathy in Iranian medical students: Measurement model of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy [47]

Shariat et al. 2013

Iran

Investigate empathy in Iranian medical students, as well as to determine the measurement model and psychometric properties of JSE in Iranian students

Cross-sectional

1187 (76.7%)

JSPE-S

- Significant decreasing linear trend in the score of empathy with increasing years of education - Females outscored male students in empathy - JSPE-S showed acceptable internal consistency and re-test reliability

- Multi-institution survey - Variable response rates at different universities

Empathy in Korean medical students: Findings from a nationwide survey [48]

Park et al. 2015

Korea

Investigate empathy scores of medical students throughout the country

Cross-sectional

5521 (39%)

JSPE-S

- Lower empathy score in males, those in higher grades, and among undergraduate students

- Multi-center survey - Low response rate

Empathy in senior year and first year medical students: a cross-sectional study [27]

Magalhães et al. 2011

Portugal

Investigate the differences in empathy scores between first-year and senior students, between genders, and between specialty preferences

Cross-sectional

476 (92%)

JSPE-S

- Sixth-year students had higher empathy scores than first-year medical students - Females had higher empathy scores than males - No significant difference in empathy scores among different speciality preferences

- Single-institution survey

Empathy in UK medical students: differences by gender, medical year and specialty interest [49]

Tavakol et al. 2011

United Kingdom

Investigate the relationship between undergraduate medical students’ empathy scores

Cross-sectional

853 (68.2%)

JSPE-S

- There was no significant difference between the mean empathy scores across year groups - Females scored significantly higher empathy scores on the JSPE-S - Medical students choosing people-orientated specialties were more empathic than students choosing technology-orientated specialties

- Single-institution survey - Missing data were replaced with the mean of all values

Empathy score among medical students in Mashhad, Iran: study of the Jefferson Scale of Physician [50]

Rezayat et al. 2018

Iran

Investigate psychometric characteristics of the JSPE scale among medical students in Mashhad, Iran

Cross-sectional

640

JSPE-S

- Empathy score among medical students decreased when their educational years increased - Higher empathy scores in females than in male students - The overall rate of empathy in basic sciences period was more than in the clinical period - Empathy decreased with increasing age

- Single-Institution survey. - No response rate - Selection bias due to exclusion criteria

Erosion of empathy during medical training by gender. A cross-sectional study [51]

Calzadilla-Núñez et al. 2017

Colombia Ecuador

Investigate whether empathic erosion is a general phenomenon in the schools of medicine included in the study and its relation to gender

Cross-sectional

University 1: 278 (98%) University 2: 756 (77.86%)

JSPE-S

- There are no general patterns of how overall empathy and its components behave over school years - Males and females do not have the same empathic response

- Multi-center survey - Some educational years have small sample sizes - No assessment of statistical significance

How well do medical students rate and communicate clinical empathy? [52]

Lim et al. 2013

New Zealand

Investigate the teaching, learning and communication skills of clinical empathy in New Zealand medical students; in particular to determine if there is a similar decline during training in that country, and how well students, peers, and tutors recognise good skills and communication of empathy

Longitudinal

72

JSPE-S= BECCI

- Self-reported empathy declines during undergraduate medical training - No significant gender difference in self-reported empathy scores was observed

- Single-institution survey

Level of Empathy among Medical Students in Kuwait University [53]

Hasan et al. 2013

Kuwait

Investigate the level of empathy among medical students at various years of study and other factors

Cross-sectional

264 (56%)

JSPE-SZKPQ-50-CCPSS-10

- Increasing empathy level with the academic year, which peaked in the 4th-year, followed by a slight drop in subsequent years - A higher level of empathy among females - The desired specialty was not significantly associated with levels of empathy

- Single-institution survey - A non-validated Arabic version of empathy scales

Maintaining empathy in medical school: It is possible [24]

Hegazi et al. 2013

Australia

Investigate levels of empathy in University of Western Sydney (UWS) Medical School students across the different years of undergraduate medical education

Cross-sectional

404 (69.78%)

JSPE-S

- No significant difference in empathy scores in relation to the year of the medical course - Gender difference in levels of empathy, favouring females

- Single-institution survey.

Malaysian Medical Students’ self-reported Empathy: A cross-sectional Comparative Study [54]

Williams et al. 2015

Malaysia

Investigate empathy levels between first-year and second-year medical students

Cross-sectional

1st year: 122 (100%) 2nd year: 71 (70%)

JSPE-S

- Self-reported empathy levels declined significantly from first-year to second-year - No significant differences in empathy scores between genders

- Single-institution survey

Rethinking empathy decline: results from an OSCE [28]

Teng et al. 2017

USA

Investigate observed empathy among medical students in different clerkship years using an OSCE

Cross-sectional

129

MPCC

- Found a possible trend towards higher MPCC among students in their second clerkship year compared with students in their first-year (p = 0.09), which became more significant when adjusting for outliers (p = 0.05) - There was no difference in performance by gender. - Students who intended to pursue a “people-orientated” specialty score higher in handling the patient’s frustration

- Single-institution survey - Small sample size

Stability of empathy among undergraduate medical students: A longitudinal study at one UK medical school [55]

Quince et al. 2011

United Kingdom

Investigate the following questions:

1. Do men and women medical students differ in empathy?

2. Does empathy change amongst men and women over time?

Longitudinal

1653

IRI

- Compared to females, males recorded lower levels of affective empathy throughout their course and lower levels of cognitive empathy for part of their medical course - Male’s affective empathy declined slightly across the course overall, while female’s affective empathy showed no change. Neither male nor female showed any change in cognitive empathy during the course

- Single-institution survey

The complexity of empathy during medical school training: Evidence for positive changes [56]

Smith et al. 2017

USA

Investigate multiple facets of empathy

Longitudinal

122

JSPE-SQCAE

- JSPE-S empathy scores decreased throughout training - Students exhibited an increase in QCAE total score over time - Females exhibited higher levels of self-reported empathy

- Single-institution survey - Small sample-size

  1. JSPE-S: Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Student Version: Measures affective empathy. The scale studies the empathic relationship between the medical student and the patient. It consists of 20 items on a 7-point Likert scale, with a minimum of 20 and a maximum of 140 points. A high score indicates a more empathic orientation [57]
  2. NEO-Five Factor Inventory: Measures personality. It consists of 60 items that depict the following five dimensions: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Openness to Experience and Consciousness. Responders answer the degree of agreement or disagreement on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4 [58]
  3. TEQ: Toronto Empathy Questionnaire: A self-reported scale. Consists of 16 questions which are designed to measure the affective component of empathy. The questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale with a total score out of 64. A high total score accounts for a high level of emotional empathy [34]
  4. RMET: Reading the mind in the eyes: Measures cognitive empathy by depicting the eye region in 36 photographs. The participant is required to identify the emotion being expressed and select an answer from four options. One point for each correct answer. The maximum score is 36 with mean scores typically ranging from 24 to 30 [34]
  5. BEES: Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale: Measures affective empathy by evaluating responses to different fictive situations and life events. It consists of 30 items of which 15 are positively worded and 15 are negatively worded. Responders answer the degree of agreement or disagreement on a 9-point Likert-scale. A high total score accounts for a high level of emotional empathy [37]
  6. OSCE: Objective structured clinical examinations [38]
  7. Empathic Skill Scale B Form: Measures empathic skill level. It consists of six psychological problems concerning daily life and 12 types of reactions to each of these problems. Responders answer on a Likert type scale. The highest achievable score is 219 and the lowest score is 64 [23]
  8. Conflict Tendency Scale: Measures adults’ communication skills and characterise their conflicts. It consists of 53 items - 31 positives and 22 negatives. The positive items depict a communication conflict. Negative items depict no conflict [23]
  9. IRI: Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Consists of four scales which includes seven items - in total 28 items. The four scales consist of ‘Perspective taking’; ‘Empathic concern’; ‘Fantasy’ and ‘Personal distress’. Altogether these items embrace some of the cornerstones of empathy [59, 60]
  10. BECCI: Behaviour Change Counselling Index: Measure of practitioner’s consultation skills about behaviour change. It consists of 11 items. An example of an item is: “Practitioner demonstrates sensitivity to talking about other issues”. Responders answer on a 5-point-Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4 [52]
  11. ZKPQ-50-CC: Zuckermann-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire: Measures personality types. It consists of 50 true-or-false questions that depict the following five dimensions: aggression and hostility, impulsive sensation seeking, neuroticism and anxiety, activity and sociability [61]
  12. PSS-10: Perceived Stress Scale 10-item version: Measures the level of stress. It consists of 10 items that depict the level of stress and the handling of this. A high score indicates a high level of stress [62]
  13. MPCC: Measure of Patient Centered Communication: Measures observed empathy. It consists of three dimensions: 1) Exploring the disease and illness experience; 2) Understanding the whole person, and; 3) Finding common ground [63]
  14. QCAE: Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective empathy: Measures affective and cognitive components of empathy. It consists of 31 items that depict five subscales: Perspective taking, Online Stimulation, Emotion Contagion, Proximal Responsivity, Peripheral Responsivity. Responders answer their degree of agreement or disagreement on a 4-point Likert scale [64]