Skip to main content

Table 2 Evidence-based medicine knowledge, awareness, and attitudes; numbers (percentage) reflect the results only for data from closed questions

From: Evidence-based medicine self-assessment, knowledge, and integration into daily practice: a survey among Romanian physicians and comparison between trainees and specialists

Item

Trainees

(n = 170)

Specialists

(n = 80)

p-value

(A01) The concept of “evidence-based medicine”? a

  

0.09

 I have heard of it, but I do not know what it means …

17 (10.0)

2 (2.5)

 

 I know, I understand…, I am not using it…

27 (15.9)

10 (12.5)

 

 I know, I understand…, I am using it…

125 (73.5)

68 (85.0)

 

 I have never heard of it

1 (0.6)

0 (0.00)

 

(A02) Source of information on EBM (multiple answers allowed)b

 Teachers

143 (84.1)

51 (63.8)

0.0004

 Physicians

49 (28.8)

30 (37.5)

0.17

 Colleagues

18 (10.6)

11 (13.8)

0.46

 Nowhere

2 (1.2)

0 (0.00)

0.33

(A03) No. of correctly identified definitions c

133 (78.2)

56 (70.0)

0.16

(A04) Uppermost in the hierarchy of evidence b

 Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses

11 (6.5)

3 (3.8)

0.39

 Systematic reviews

3 (1.8)

2 (2.5)

0.71

 Meta-analyses

13 (7.6)

9 (11.3)

0.34

 Randomized controlled trials (RCT)

12 (7.1)

9 (11.3)

0.27

 Systematic reviews, Meta-analyses, RCT

19 (11.2)

7 (8.8)

0.05

(A05) Lowest in the hierarchy of evidence b

 In vitro research

6 (3.5)

1 (1.3)

0.33

 Animal study

1 (0.6)

1 (1.3)

0.57

 Idea, editorial, or expert opinions

12 (7.1)

3 (3.8)

0.31

 An animal research, in vitro research

5 (2.9)

1 (1.3)

0.44

 Idea, editorial, review or expert opinions, animal research, in vitro research

10 (5.9)

0 (0.0)

0.03

(A06) Level of evidence considered when reading literature a

  

0.21

 Always

70 (41.2)

42 (52.5)

 

 Sometimes

72 (42.4)

31 (38.8)

 

 Never, but I know this classification

5 (2.9)

0 (0.0)

 

 I have ignored this classification

14 (8.2)

6 (7.5)

 

 I have never heard of it

9 (5.3)

1 (1.3)

 

(A07) Strength of evidence a

  

0.34

 Yes, always

56 (32.9)

34 (42.5)

 

 Sometimes

77 (45.3)

36 (45.0)

 

 Never, but I know this classification

6 (3.5)

1 (1.3)

 

 I have ignored this classification

9 (5.3)

1 (1.3)

 

 I have never heard of it

22 (12.9)

8 (10.0)

 

(A08) Continuing medical education: reading b

 Online free medical articles

135 (79.4)

64 (80.0)

0.91

 Online paid medical articles

58 (34.1)

38 (47.5)

0.04

 Printed free medical articles

68 (40.0)

24 (30.0)

0.13

 Printed paid medical articles

28 (16.5)

17 (21.3)

0.36

 Medical articles available on apps

89 (52.4)

35 (43.8)

0.21

(A11) Reading scientific articles: preferences a

  

0.28

 Original articles

80 (47.1)

38 (47.5)

 

 Meta-analyses

49 (28.8)

18 (22.5)

 

 Systematic reviews

31 (18.2)

22 (27.5)

 

 I do not know the difference

5 (2.9)

0 (0.0)

 

 I do not read articles or journals; I prefer books

5 (2.9)

2 (2.5)

 

(A12) The use of EBM b

 Medical decisions

166 (97.6)

79 (98.8)

0.53

 To know what is new in the medical field

104 (61.2)

34 (42.5)

0.01

 To know the structure of a scientific paper

109 (64.1)

36 (45.0)

0.004

 I have not yet understood the usefulness of EBM

3 (1.8)

0 (0.0)

0.23

 I do not consider EMB in current practice

0 (0.38)

1 (1.3)

0.41

  1. a Fisher’s exact test; b Z-test for proportions; cChi-square test