Table 4 Pattern matrix and communalities (h²) for student inventory

3.1

Feedback was informed by observation of my practice

0.688

0.112

.589

6.2

Feedback was relevant to my situation^a

0.729

0.017

0.108

.655

6.7

I understood what the feedback meant

0.806

− 0.109

0.138

.682

8.3

Feedback motivated me to change

0.718

−0.105

0.086

.502

8.4

Feedback helped me to know how to improve my practice

0.691

0.018

0.174

.670

9.1

I felt comfortable sharing my opinion/viewpoint^a

0.719

0.174

−0.098

.612

9.3

Feedback was communicated in a way I understood

0.793

−0.085

0.109

.653

10.1

Feedback was respectful^a

0.849

0.052

−0.122

.665

10.2

Feedback was clear^a

0.733

0.123

−0.068

.603

10.3

Feedback was non-judgemental^a

0.661

0.021

0.144

.592

10.5

Feedback focused on my practice

0.609

0.189

0.112

.671

2.3

Feedback related to specific standards

−0.080

0.806

0.124

.701

5.1

There was enough time for feedback^a

0.216

0.598

0.010

.578

5.4

Feedback occurred at an agreed time^a

−0.096

0.766

0.173

.675

6.3

I was encouraged to be involved in feedback conversations^a

(0.303)

0.490

0.050

.570

6.5

I had the opportunity to clarify feedback

(0.444)

0.496

−0.026

.694

7.3

Feedback was planned

−0.079

0.809

0.121

.702

10.6

My emotional needs were considered^a

0.294

0.608

−0.061

.620

11.1

Feedback was offered in more than one way

0.106

0.660

0.039

.573

1.2

I was encouraged to reflect on evaluation

0.046

0.080

0.704

.616

8.1

Learning goals were reviewed based on feedback

0.087

0.030

0.631

.497

11.4

Feedback focused on my knowledge

0.025

0.086

0.717

.620

11.6

My decision making process was considered

0.090

0.094

0.690

.656

12.43

1.86

1.23

54.03%

8.07%

5.36%

.946

.930

.857