Table 2 Initial 50 student items and associated feedback attributes
Items – Student inventorya | Feedback Attributeb | |
|---|---|---|
1.1 | I was encouraged to evaluate my own practice | Process |
1.2 | I was encouraged to reflect on my evaluation | |
1.3 | I had an opportunity to share my reflection as part of the feedback process | |
2.1 | The learning goals for my practice were agreed in advance with my assessor/nurse | Criteria-based |
2.2 | Feedback was based on the agreed learning goals | |
2.3 | Feedback related to specific standards | |
2.4 | Feedback was relevant to what was expected of me | |
3.1 | Feedback was informed by observation of my practice | Multiple forms and sources of evidence |
3.2 | Feedback was informed by multiple sources | |
4.1 | I asked for feedback3 | Desired |
4.2 | I appreciated the feedback | |
4.3 | Feedback was welcomed | |
5.1 | There was enough time for feedback | Timely |
5.2 | Feedback was not rushed | |
5.3 | Feedback was timely | |
5.4 | Feedback occurred at an agreed time | |
6.1 | Feedback was specific to my learning needs | Responsive to the learner |
6.2 | Feedback was relevant to my situation | |
6.3 | I was encouraged to be involved in feedback conversations | |
6.5 | I had the opportunity to clarify feedback | |
6.6 | I was encouraged to ask questions to help me understand the feedback | |
6.7 | I understood what the feedback meant | |
7.1 | The amount of feedback was manageable | Frequent |
7.2 | Feedback was regular | |
7.3 | Feedback was planned | |
7.4 | Feedback was expected | |
8.1 | Learning goals were reviewed based on feedback | Future-focused |
8.2 | Learning goals were modified based on feedbackc | |
8.3 | Feedback motivated me to change | |
8.4 | Feedback helped me to know how to improve my practice | |
9.1 | I felt comfortable sharing my opinion/viewpoint | Reciprocal |
9.2 | I felt I was listened to | |
9.3 | Feedback was communicated in a way I understood | |
10.1 | Feedback was respectful | Skilful interaction |
10.2 | Feedback was clear | |
10.3 | Feedback was non-judgemental | |
10.4 | Feedback was non-threatening | |
10.5 | Feedback focused on my practice | |
10.6 | My emotional needs were considered | |
10.7 | Feedback was specific not general | |
10.8 | Feedback addressed specific area/s of my practice | |
11.1 | Feedback was offered in more than one way | Multidimensional |
11.2 | Feedback was offered in different ways | |
11.3 | Feedback was offered at multiple times | |
11.4 | Feedback focused on my knowledge | |
11.5 | Feedback focused on my performance | |
11.6 | My decision making process was considered | |
11.7 | Feedback encouraged me to share my feelings about different experiences | |
11.8 | Feedback encouraged me to think about how my individual beliefs/values influenced my practice | |
11.9 | Feedback encouraged me to think about what motivates me to learn | |
12.1 | Feedback is important to me | Global items |
12.2 | The communication regarding my performance was labelled as ‘feedback’ | |
12.3 | Overall, the feedback shared reinforced my practice | |
12.4 | Overall, the feedback helped me change my practice | |
12.5 | Overall, the feedback made me think differently about my practice | |