| Satisfaction | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | No. | Recommendation of the advisor | Fulfillment of scientific expectations | Excellent to good experience as a PECEM student |
1 | Perceived quality of the advisor | Skills development | ||
1. Knowledge* | 1. Usefulness* | |||
2. Attitude* | 2. Contribution* | |||
3. Willingness* | 3. Training* | |||
4. Time spent* | 4. Diversity* | |||
5. Feedback* | Â | |||
2 | Skills development | Infrastructure and support | ||
1. Usefulness* | 1. Guidance from the graduate students | |||
2. Contribution* | 2. Facilities | |||
3. Training* | 3. Compatibility* | |||
4. Diversity* | 4. Guidance from the laboratory technician | |||
 | 5. Supplies* | |||
3 | Infrastructure and support | Perceived quality of the advisor | ||
1. Guidance from the graduate students* | 1. Knowledge | |||
2. Facilities* | 2. Attitude | |||
3. Compatibility* | 3. Willingness* | |||
4. Guidance from the laboratory technician* | 4. Time spent* | |||
5. Supplies* | 5. Feedback | |||
 | Dissatisfaction | |||
Dimensions | No. | No recommendation of the advisor | Lack of fulfillment of scientific expectations | Regular to very poor experience as a PECEM student |
1 | Infrastructure and support | |||
1. Guidance from the laboratory technician** | ||||
2. Guidance from the graduate students* | 2. Supplies* | |||
3. Supplies* | 3. Guidance from the graduate students | |||
4. Compatibility* | ||||
5. Facilities*** | ||||
2 | Perceived quality of the advisor | |||
1. Time spent* | 1. Willingness* | 1. Time spent* | ||
2. Willingness* | 2. Time spent* | 2. Feedback | ||
3. Feedback* | 3. Willingness* | |||
4. Knowledge* | 4. Attitude | |||
5. Attitude* | 5. Knowledge§ | |||
3 | Skills development | |||
1. Training* | 1. Contribution* | |||
2. Diversity* | 2. Usefulness* | 2. Training* | ||
3. Usefulness* | 3. Diversity* | 3. Usefulness§* | ||
4. Contribution* | 4. Diversity§* |