Table 1 Statistic results of student evaluations (n = 672). All items were subjectively evaluated as grades from 1 to 6 with 1 being the best possible grade. Overall rating ranged from 0 to 15 points with 15 as best rating. Univariable regression was performed both linear with the endpoint overall rating and also binary logistic with the endpoint negative perception. For linear univariable regression, parameter estimates ± their standard deviation are displayed (maximum likelihood estimates). For binary univariable regression, the odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval is shown (Wald)

Teacher

Feedback

1 (1–2)

−1.236 ± 0.071; p < 0.001

1.613 (1.353–1.923; p < .001)

Pathophysiology

1 (1–1)

−1.037 ± 0.079; p < 0.001

2.756 (2.036–3.729; p < 0.001)

Presentation of content

1 (1–1)

−1.341 ± 0.158; p < 0.001

3.987 (2.424–6.556; p < 0.001)

Learning goals met

1 (1–2)

−0.959 ± 0.060; p < 0.001

2.798 (2.143–3.653; p < 0.001)

Supervision

1 (1–3)

−0.322 ± 0.039; p < 0.001

1.332 (1.130–1.569; p = 0.001)

Friendliness

1 (1–1)

−1.145 ± 0.224; p < 0.001

2.165 (1.07–4.378; p = 0.050)

Punctual beginning

1 (1–1)

−0.573 ± 0.080; p < 0.001

1.579 (1.226–2.033; p = 0.001)

Student

Active participation

1 (1–1)

−1.380 ± 0.158; p < 0.001

2.474 (1.523–4.018; p < 0.001)

Increase of interest

2 (1–3)

−0.599 ± 0.044; p < 0.001

1.814 (1.498–2.197; p < 0.001)

Structure

Structure

1 (1–2)

−1.236 ± 0.071; p < 0.001

3.596 (2.595–4.983; p < 0.001)

Learning goals defined

1 (1–2)

−0.678 ± 0.046; p < 0.001

2.09 (1.73–2.525; p < 0.001)

Ward personnel

1 (1–2)

−0.691 ± 0.057; p < 0.001

1.976 (1.624–2.403; p < 0.001)

Endpoints

Overall rating

13 (12–14)

–

–

Negative perception

94 (13.99%)

–

–