Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of rationale, methods, and findings as guided by the Kane’s Framework for validity during study course using InCoPrA

From: Professionalism and inter-communication skills (ICS): a multi-site validity study assessing proficiency in core competencies and milestones in medical learners

Steps

Rationale

Methods

Results

Scoring

Render the observed experiment into a quantitative or qualitative scoring system

Direct observations and assessments by faculty and SPs using InCoPrA

Table 2

Generalization

Translate these scoring systems or scales developed into a meaningful general/overall interpretation of the performance

Meaningful feedback formulation through InCoPrA’s graded and nominal scale and narratives

Tables 2 & 3

Extrapolation

Imply how/what this generalized inference translates into the real-world setting /experience

Comparing and discussing simulation feedback to real-life performance feedback

Table 4

Implication

Draw a final conclusion and reach a decision regarding its value/results

Faculty providing next-steps direction and recommendations to support milestones growth and progress

Table 4-guided

Verbal discussions

ACGME-supported Evaluation forms and mentored discussions

  1. InCoPrA Instrument for Communication skills and Professionalism Assessment; SP Standardized Patients; ACGME Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education