Table 4 Evaluation of the determinants of students’ global satisfaction with electives
From: Electives in the medical curriculum – an opportunity to achieve students’ satisfaction?
ß crude | (95% CI) | ß adjusted | (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | ||||
Female | Ref | |||
Male | −0.503 | (−1.968;0.962) | 0.135 | (−0.899;1.168) |
Age (year) | 0.017 | (−0.250; 0.284) | 0.036 | (−0.147;0.220) |
Grade (0–20) | 3.505 *** | (2.920; 4.091) | 1.325*** | (0.786;1.863) |
Agrees with assessment methodology | 11,114 *** | (9.641;12.587) | 4.850*** | (3.400;6.300) |
Perception of workload (5–25) | −4.150 *** | (−4.699;-3600) | −2.531*** | (−3.169;-1.892) |
Attendance | 1.073 | (−0.695;2.841) | 0.965 | (−0.261;2.191) |
Agrees with teaching methodology | 13.425 *** | (10.991;15.859) | 8.297*** | (6.279;10.315) |
Score NASA (1–10) | −0.275 *** | (−0.352;-0.197) | − 0.009 | (− 0.079;0.061) |
Frequency of study > 0 | −1.432 | (−3.044;0.181) | 2.217*** | (1.004;4.429) |
Number of students in 2015/2016 (N.x/100) | 2.042 *** | (1.587;2.497) | 0.848*** | (0.450;1.246) |
Order of preference in 2015/2016 (V1.x) | −0.288 | (− 0.825;0.250) | 0.537** | (0.143;0.931) |