Skip to main content

Table 2 TADs source of information, and aspects of continuing education according to study participants

From: Knowledge of undergraduate dental students toward orthodontic skeletal temporary anchorage devices at Kuwait University

Question

5th year students

6th year students

7th year students

  

N = 22

N (%)

N = 28

N (%)

N = 22

N (%)

X2

P value

Did you receive any info about orthodontic mini implant during the undergraduate orthodontic program?

 Yes

3 (13.6) a

22 (78.6) b

22 (100) b

39.7

0.000

 No

19 (86.4)

6 (21.4)

0

  

Are you receiving any info about orthodontic mini implant from other sources?

 Yes

1 (4.5) b

6 (21.4) a

1 (4.5) b

4.9

0.085

 No

21 (95.5)

22 (78.6)

21 (95.5)

  

Would you like more info about orthodontic mini implant as a treatment modality in the undergraduate orthodontic curriculum?

 Yes

17 (77.3)

19 (67.9)

15 (68.2)

0.64

0.727

 No

5 (22.7)

9 (32.1)

7 (31.8)

  

From where would you like to get more reliable information about orthodontic mini implants?

 Continuing education

5 (22.7)a

12 (44.4) b

14 (63.6) b

7.5

0.024

  Professional journals and books

5 (22.7)

4 (14.3)

3 (13.6)

0.84

0.657

  Consultants orthodontists

16 (72.7)

15 (53.6)

16 (72.7)

2.7

0.25

 Internet

2 (9.1)

7 (25)

4 (18.2)

2.1

0.349

 Others

1 (4.5)

0

0

2.3

0.316

Would like to have the mini implant course introduced earlier in the orthodontic curriculum? What year?

 

 Yes

15 (68.2)

13 (46.4)

14 (63.6)

2.7

0.251

  In 5th year

0

0

1 (7.2)

  

  In 6th year

15 (100)

13 (100)

13 (92.8)

  

 No

7 (31.8)

15 (53.6)

8 (36.4)

  

Are you able to diagnose cases seen in your dental practice that may benefit from use of orthodontic mini implant?

 Yes

2 (9.1)

9 (32.1)

12 (54.5)

10.5

0.005

 No

20 (90.9)

19 (67.9)

10 (45.5)

  
  1. * p < 0.05 = significant difference
  2. a-b values within rows with different superscript letters are significantly different (P < 0.05) using post hoc test