Skip to main content

Table 3 Coding analysis of barriers to obtaining reliable evaluation results

From: Barriers to obtaining reliable results from evaluations of teaching quality in undergraduate medical education

Conceptual refinement

Open coding

Axial coding

Selective coding

Pay attention to, negativity perfunctory, careless, etc.

Emphasis on teaching quality

Attitude towards evaluation

Evaluation preparation

Mandatory, reminder, course selection time limit, related to test results, etc.

Participation in teaching evaluation

Research orientation, focus, energy, academic frontiers, etc.

Balance between research and teaching

Idea of evaluation

Reform, bondage, indoctrination, etc.

Encouragement of innovative teaching methods/models

Thinking logic, innovation, utilitarian, acceptance, etc.

Respect the major role played by students

Experienced, objective, reference value, human relationship, etc.

Professionalism of the subject

Evaluation subject and weight

Coverage, comprehensive, continuous, no time, etc.

Participation of the subject

Responsible person, joint responsibility, hiring teacher, mobility, etc.

Number of instructors for the course

Targets for evaluation

Overall effect, quality, teaching team, basic score, etc.

Convenience of teaching evaluation

Smart classroom, projector, teaching software, etc.

Fluency in the use of teaching equipment

Teaching quality guarantee system

Arrivals, fingerprints, attendance, etc.

Student attendance management

Electives courses, required courses, theoretical courses, humanities, etc.

Type of the curriculum

Specific indicators

Index system

Standards, understanding, materialization, etc.

Indicator connotation

Excessive, burdensome, simple, etc.

Indicator structure

Concerns, points, special, etc.

Importance of the Indicator

Indicator weight

Distinction, median, mean, maximum and minimum, fairness, etc.

Analysis mode

Calculation method

Group teaching, false results, assignments, discussions, etc.

Course arrangement

Teaching performance

Operation process

Skilled, vivid, attractive, thinking, etc.

Capacity and effectiveness of teaching

Truancy, discipline, lateness, etc.

Classroom management

Evaluation in the classroom, remember, timeliness, immediate, QR code, link, etc.

Timeliness of evaluation

Evaluation time

Mid-term, end-of-term, biased, not over, exams, etc.

Comprehensiveness of evaluation

Updates, inconsistent conditions, incomplete information, no correspondence, etc.

Integrity of teacher information

Computer operating system

Sensitive, flashback, mobile, experience, operation, etc.

Fluency in system usage

Written, verbal, guided, merit, communication, after class, etc.

Teaching improvements

Feedback loop

Consequences of evaluation

Class management, deficiencies, tutor selection, Q & A, etc.

Emotion of teachers

Material, motivation, assessment, reward and punishment, promotion, selection, etc.

Teacher motivation

Basis of rewards and punishment

Excellence, improvement, stress, collective lesson preparation, etc.

Teacher growth

Ask, improve, feel, self-evaluate, etc.

Initiative to improve

Follow up the correction and improvement

Targeting, monitoring, focus, quality, etc.

Effectiveness of improvement measures