Skip to main content

Table 2 Intervention group medical student responses to the acceptability survey

From: Online patient simulation training to improve clinical reasoning: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

  Strongly agree/ Agree Neither agree or disagree Strongly disagree/ Disagree
Statement n (%) n (%) n (%)
It was easy to navigate through eCREST 96/98 (98) 1/98 (1) 1/98 (1)
The level of difficulty of the material was appropriate 95/98 (97) 3/98 (3) 0/98 (0)
eCREST should be used to supplement traditional teaching 88/98 (90) 9/98 (9) 1/98 (1)
eCREST helped me to learn clinical reasoning skills to apply to clinical work 80/98 (82) 15/98 (15) 3/98 (3)
Overall, using eCREST enhanced my learning 84/98 (86) 13/98 (13) 1/98 (1)
I would use eCREST in the future without an incentive 84/98 (86) 10/98 (10) 4/98 (4)
  1. Notes: results are taken from across all 3 schools. 98 students in the intervention group completed the acceptability survey at Time 1