Skip to main content

Table 2 Intervention group medical student responses to the acceptability survey

From: Online patient simulation training to improve clinical reasoning: a feasibility randomised controlled trial

 

Strongly agree/ Agree

Neither agree or disagree

Strongly disagree/ Disagree

Statement

n (%)

n (%)

n (%)

It was easy to navigate through eCREST

96/98 (98)

1/98 (1)

1/98 (1)

The level of difficulty of the material was appropriate

95/98 (97)

3/98 (3)

0/98 (0)

eCREST should be used to supplement traditional teaching

88/98 (90)

9/98 (9)

1/98 (1)

eCREST helped me to learn clinical reasoning skills to apply to clinical work

80/98 (82)

15/98 (15)

3/98 (3)

Overall, using eCREST enhanced my learning

84/98 (86)

13/98 (13)

1/98 (1)

I would use eCREST in the future without an incentive

84/98 (86)

10/98 (10)

4/98 (4)

  1. Notes: results are taken from across all 3 schools. 98 students in the intervention group completed the acceptability survey at Time 1