Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological quality of the included studies

From: A meta-analysis of students’ readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning

Study

Selection

Comparability

Outcomes

Total score

Quality of studies

Cheng et al. (2014) [15]

6

Good

Farland et al. (2018)

6

Fair

Goolsarran et al. (2018) [16]

 

4

Fair

Hemmati Maslakpak et al. (2015)

7

Good

Huang et al. (2016)

6

Good

Lochner et al. (2018)

5

Fair

Luetmer et al. (2018) [17]

 

6

Fair

Nishigawa et al. (2017)

6

Fair

Park et al. (2015) [18]

5

Fair

Park et al. (2018)

7

Good

  1. According to Newcastle – Ottawa quality assessment scale for cohort and case control studies, each study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each item within the “Selection” and “Outcome” categories, and two stars in maximum for “Comparability”