Table 3 The percentage of e-portfolios that met the different SRL criteria for good practice from the codebook. The numbers in front of the criteria correspond to the item numbers of the codebook (Appendix A). The codebook describes the instructions used to decide if the criteria were met
From: How is self-regulated learning documented in e-portfolios of trainees? A content analysis
Criteria from the codebook | How many e-portfolios fulfilled the criterium (%) N = 90 |
|---|---|
Reflection | |
 4. Presence of reflective forms | 54.4%(n = 49) |
 5. If present, at what level | |
   Not reflective | 83.7% (n = 41) |
   Descriptive reflection | 16.3%(n = 8) |
   Dialogic reflection | 0% (n = 0) |
   Critical reflection | 0% (n = 0) |
Feedback Teacher | |
 6. For which competences was feedback provided? | |
   Medical Expert | 85.6%(n = 77) |
   Communicator | 92.2%(n = 83) |
   Collaborator | 87.7%(n = 79) |
   Leader | 87.8%(n = 79) |
   Health Advocate | 65.6%(n = 59) |
   Scholar | 84.4%(n = 76) |
   Professional | 94.4% (n = 85) |
   None | 0% (n = 0) |
 7. Specificity Was the feedback provided specific enough? | 27.8%(n = 25) |
 8. Focus Did the feedback provided have an appropriate focus? | 91.1%(n = 82) |
 9. Purpose Was the feedback provided in line with the purpose of the specific form? | 58.9%(n = 53) |
 10. Source Were the criteria/source upon which the feedback was based clear? | 57.8%(n = 52) |
 11. Level Did the provided feedback give insight into the level the trainee must attain? | 13.3% (n = 12) |
Feedback Supervisor | |
 13. For which competences was feedback provided? | |
   Medical Expert | 86.7%(n = 78) |
   Communicator | 76.7%(n = 69) |
   Collaborator | 37.8% (n = 34) |
   Leader | 34.4%(n = 31) |
   Health Advocate | 21.1%(n = 19) |
   Scholar | 21.1%(n = 19) |
   Professional | 36.7%(n = 33) |
   None | 1.1%(n = 1) |
 14. Specificity Was the feedback provided specific enough? | 35.6%(n = 32) |
 15. Focus Did the feedback provided have an appropriate focus? | 87.8%(n = 79) |
 16. Purpose Was the feedback provided in line with the purpose of the specific form? | 73.3%(n = 66) |
 17. Source Were the criteria/source upon which the feedback was based clear? | 57.8%(n = 52) |
 18. Level Did the feedback provided give insight in the level the trainee must attain? | 33.3%(n = 30) |
Goal-Setting and Planning | |
 20. Specificity Were the formulated learning goals specific? | 44.4%(n = 40) |
 21. Proximity Were the formulated learning goals proximal (≤4 months)? | 23.3%(n = 21) |
 22. Congruence Were the formulated learning goals in congruence with each other? | 87.8%(n = 79) |
 23. Challenging Were the formulated learning goals challenging? | 97.8%(n = 88) |
 24. Origin Were the formulated learning goals of a personal origin? | 64.4%(n = 58) |
Monitoring | |
 25. Monitoring Did the e-portfolio show signs of monitoring? | 74.4%(n = 67) |