Skip to main content

Table 3 The percentage of e-portfolios that met the different SRL criteria for good practice from the codebook. The numbers in front of the criteria correspond to the item numbers of the codebook (Appendix A). The codebook describes the instructions used to decide if the criteria were met

From: How is self-regulated learning documented in e-portfolios of trainees? A content analysis

Criteria from the codebookHow many e-portfolios fulfilled the criterium (%)
N = 90
Reflection
 4. Presence of reflective forms54.4%(n = 49)
 5. If present, at what level
   Not reflective83.7% (n = 41)
   Descriptive reflection16.3%(n = 8)
   Dialogic reflection0% (n = 0)
   Critical reflection0% (n = 0)
Feedback Teacher
 6. For which competences was feedback provided?
   Medical Expert85.6%(n = 77)
   Communicator92.2%(n = 83)
   Collaborator87.7%(n = 79)
   Leader87.8%(n = 79)
   Health Advocate65.6%(n = 59)
   Scholar84.4%(n = 76)
   Professional94.4% (n = 85)
   None0% (n = 0)
 7. Specificity
Was the feedback provided specific enough?
27.8%(n = 25)
 8. Focus
Did the feedback provided have an appropriate focus?
91.1%(n = 82)
 9. Purpose
Was the feedback provided in line with the purpose of the specific form?
58.9%(n = 53)
 10. Source
Were the criteria/source upon which the feedback was based clear?
57.8%(n = 52)
 11. Level
Did the provided feedback give insight into the level the trainee must attain?
13.3% (n = 12)
Feedback Supervisor
 13. For which competences was feedback provided?
   Medical Expert86.7%(n = 78)
   Communicator76.7%(n = 69)
   Collaborator37.8% (n = 34)
   Leader34.4%(n = 31)
   Health Advocate21.1%(n = 19)
   Scholar21.1%(n = 19)
   Professional36.7%(n = 33)
   None1.1%(n = 1)
 14. Specificity
Was the feedback provided specific enough?
35.6%(n = 32)
 15. Focus
Did the feedback provided have an appropriate focus?
87.8%(n = 79)
 16. Purpose
Was the feedback provided in line with the purpose of the specific form?
73.3%(n = 66)
 17. Source
Were the criteria/source upon which the feedback was based clear?
57.8%(n = 52)
 18. Level
Did the feedback provided give insight in the level the trainee must attain?
33.3%(n = 30)
Goal-Setting and Planning
 20. Specificity
Were the formulated learning goals specific?
44.4%(n = 40)
 21. Proximity
Were the formulated learning goals proximal (≤4 months)?
23.3%(n = 21)
 22. Congruence
Were the formulated learning goals in congruence with each other?
87.8%(n = 79)
 23. Challenging
Were the formulated learning goals challenging?
97.8%(n = 88)
 24. Origin
Were the formulated learning goals of a personal origin?
64.4%(n = 58)
Monitoring
 25. Monitoring
Did the e-portfolio show signs of monitoring?
74.4%(n = 67)