Table 3 serial evaluation of participants’ familiarity with core competency (CC) teachings and assessments (n = 28 in each group)
Questions | regular FD module participants | intervention FD module participants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I am familiar with … .. 1.delivering CC-based teachings | pre-module | end-of-module (Δ% from pre-module) | follow-up (Δ% from pre-module) | pre-module | end-of-module (Δ% from pre-module) | follow-up (Δ% from pre-module) |
-Teaching clinics | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.3 (20%) | 4.3 ± 0.1 (23%) | 3.4 ± 0.8 | 4.6 ± 0.9 (35%)* #1.33 | 4.7 ± 0.2 (38%)* #4 |
-Itinerant bedside | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.5 (19%) | 4.6 ± 0.7 (28%) | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.5 (16%) | 4.5 ± 0.6 (22%) |
-Circuit bedside | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 4.6 ± 0.5 (24%) | 4.5 ± 0.6 (22%) | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.7 (11%) | 4.6 ± 0.3 (21%) |
2. delivering CC-based assessments | ||||||
 - Case-based discussion (CBD) | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.3 (21%) | 3.7 ± 0.4 (28%) | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 4.2 ± 0.5 (50%)* #2.33 | 4.4 ± 0.6 (57%)* #1.75 |
 -mini-CEX | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 3.7 ± 0.6 (12%) | 3.8 ± 0.3 (15%) | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 4.4 ± 0.6 (42%)* #1.17 | 4.5 ± 0.2 (45%)* #2.33 |
 -OSCE | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.2 (22%) | 3.2 ± 0.4 (19%) | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.3 (48%)* #5 | 4.2 ± 0.5 (45%)* #2.5 |
3.designing CC-based teachings | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.2 (47%) | 3.0 ± 0.4 (57%) | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 4.2 ± 0.5 (100%)** #7 | 4.4 ± 0.6 (109%)** #3.5 |
4.designing CC-based assessments | 2.2 ± .0.8 | 2.5 ± 0.3 (14%) | 2.5 ± 0.7 (14%) | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.3 (70%)* #4.67 | 4.1 ± 0.4 (78%)* #2.29 |
5.leading CC-based teachings | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.3 (16%) | 2.7 ± 0.2 (42%) | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.6 (67%)* #4.33 | 3.9 ± 0.2 (86%)* #6 |
6.leading CC-based assessments | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2.3 ± 0.4 (10%) | 2.2 ± 0.5 (5%) | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.9 (100%)** #3.75 | 3.9 ± 0.3 (105%)** #3.4 |