Table 1 Demonstration of the ranking algorithm (1 = top rank)
From: Selecting top candidates for medical school selection interviews- a non-compensatory approach
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applicant | UAMT | ATAR | RU | RA | Lowest rank (1 is top rank) | LR | Mean rank | MR |
11 | 70 | 96.00 | 4.5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4.75 | 2 |
2 | 80 | 94.35 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 4.5 | 1 |
6 | 68 | 94.35 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 6.5 | 6 |
10 | 67 | 94.35 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7.5 |
9 | 66 | 97.00 | 8 | 3.5 | 8 | 5 | 5.75 | 3.5 |
13 | 60 | 98.00 | 10 | 1.5 | 10 | 6 | 5.75 | 3.5 |
4 | 59 | 98.00 | 11 | 1.5 | 11 | 7 | 6.25 | 5 |
7 | 70 | 92.00 | 4.5 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 7.75 | 9 |
12 | 58 | 93.00 | 12 | 9.5 | 12 | 9 | 10.75 | 12 |
5 | 85 | 91.15 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 7.5 |
14 | 71 | 91.15 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 8 | 10 |
3 | 63 | 91.15 | 9 | 13 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 13.5 |
8 | 54 | 97.00 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 13.5 | 13 | 8.5 | 11 |
1 | 54 | 93.00 | 13.5 | 8.5 | 13.5 | 14 | 11 | 13.5 |