Feedback item | Percentage of agreement | −Mean ± SD (China) | −Mean ± SD (Australia) |
---|---|---|---|
Clinical educators can correctly use the APP-Chinese with a 0–4 point rating scale | 100% | 4.20 ± 0.41 | 4.10 ± 1.00 |
Performance indicators are useful for evaluating the performance before mid-term feedback | 100% | 4.13 ± 0.35 | 3.90 ± 0.70 |
The scoring rules are appropriate | 100% | 4.33 ± 0.49 | 4.00 ± 0.90 |
The expected entry-level performance (passing level) was clear to me | 66% | 3.67 ± 0.49 | 4.00 ± 0.90 |
Easy to understand | 93% | 3.93 ± 0.26 | 3.90 ± 0.70 |
Practical in clinical teaching | 80% | 3.93 ± 0.59 | 4.10 ± 0.70 |
Understand the level of performance corresponding to score of ‘4’ | 86.7% | 4.07 ± 0.59 | 3.90 ± 1.00 |
Received sufficient information on the APP before the start of the clinical placement | 86.7% | 4.00 ± 0.54 | 4.10 ± 0.70 |
The global rating scale (GRS)can reflect my performance fairly | 100% | 4.13 ± 0.35 | 4.00 ± 1.30 |
Each of the 20 indicators can reflect my performance fairly | 86.7% | 4.13 ± 0.64 | 3.90 ± 1.20 |