Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean score of the feedback items from Chinese students using the APP-Chinese compared to reported scores from Australian students using the APP [10]

From: Acceptance of the ‘Assessment of Physiotherapy Practice (Chinese)’ as a standardised evaluation of professional competency in Chinese physiotherapy students: an observational study

Feedback item

Percentage of agreement

Mean ± SD

(China)

Mean ± SD

(Australia)

Clinical educators can correctly use the APP-Chinese with a 0–4 point rating scale

100%

4.20 ± 0.41

4.10 ± 1.00

Performance indicators are useful for evaluating the performance before mid-term feedback

100%

4.13 ± 0.35

3.90 ± 0.70

The scoring rules are appropriate

100%

4.33 ± 0.49

4.00 ± 0.90

The expected entry-level performance (passing level) was clear to me

66%

3.67 ± 0.49

4.00 ± 0.90

Easy to understand

93%

3.93 ± 0.26

3.90 ± 0.70

Practical in clinical teaching

80%

3.93 ± 0.59

4.10 ± 0.70

Understand the level of performance corresponding to score of ‘4’

86.7%

4.07 ± 0.59

3.90 ± 1.00

Received sufficient information on the APP before the start of the clinical placement

86.7%

4.00 ± 0.54

4.10 ± 0.70

The global rating scale (GRS)can reflect my performance fairly

100%

4.13 ± 0.35

4.00 ± 1.30

Each of the 20 indicators can reflect my performance fairly

86.7%

4.13 ± 0.64

3.90 ± 1.20

  1. SD Standard deviation