Skip to main content

Table 3 Changes in nurse mentors’ debriefing skills over time in Bihar, India, 2015–2017 (N = 73 simulation debrief videos)

From: Training and evaluating simulation debriefers in low-resource settings: lessons learned from Bihar, India

  

Early: months 3–4

n = 33

Mid: month 5

n = 18

Late: months 6–7

n = 22

 

Indicator

N

Mean (SD*)

p-value

CAPE Tool

Communication

 Instructor questions

73

34 (22)

48 (26)

49 (27)

< 0.01 §

 Trainee response

73

50 (24)

69 (25)

64 (27)

< 0.01 §

 Trainee responses to instructor questions + statements ratio

73

0.75 (0.15)

0.79 (0.16)

0.78 (0.15)

0.20 §

Structure

 Video Length

71

17.6 (8.1)

20.3 (8.7)

17.8 (8.1)

0.74 §

 Length of description phase (min)

73

1.0 (0.8)

1.0 (0.5)

1.1 (0.8)

0.83 §

 Length of analysis phase (min)

73

13.7 (8.5)

17.4 (8.9)

15.6 (7.4)

0.18 § ‡

 Length of application phase (min)

73

1.1 (0.8)

1.4 (1.1)

0.8 (0.9)

0.22 §

 All three phases present (%)

73

71 (46)

86 (35)

61 (49)

0.37 #

Objectives

 Behavioral objectives mentioned

73

5.6 (4.0)

7.0 (4.0)

6.3 (4.9)

0.33 §

 Technical objectives mentioned

73

3.3 (3.7)

3.4 (4.0)

3.1 (2.9)

0.78 §

Video use

 Use of video playback (%)

73

85 (36)

89 (32)

73 (45)

0.14 #

 Number of times tape paused during

73

6.7 (6.7)

8.8 (4.8)

5.6 (5.8)

0.48 §

 Length of tape segments played (min)

73

4.5 (3.4)

4.3 (2.5)

3.3 (2.9)

0.06 §

DASH

Elements

 2: Organize the debrief

72

3.3 (1.0)

3.8 (0.7)

3.5 (0.9)

0.04 § α

 3: Facilitate discussion

72

3.4 (0.7)

3.8 (0.7)

3.6 (0.8)

0.14 § #

  1. § Linear regression adjusting for rater.
  2. # Logistic regression adjusting for rater.
  3. * Standard Deviation (SD)
  4. ‡ This value was not significant at the 0.05 in the GEE model.