Table 3 Number of physicians (%) who would spend additional medical resources
Patient impression (Likert scale) | Unfavourable (1–2) | Neutral (3) | Favourable (4–5) | p value* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Case A | ||||
Q1 | 24 (72%) | 106 (80%) | 33 (89%) | 0.20 |
Q2 | 21 (64%) | 79 (60%) | 25 (68%) | 0.67 |
Q3 | 15 (45%) | 79 (60%) | 28 (76%) | < 0.05 |
Q4 | 22 (67%) | 79 (60%) | 26 (70%) | 0.45 |
Case B | ||||
Q1 | 36 (84%) | 106 (89%) | 39 (98%) | 0.08 |
Q2 | 38 (88%) | 113 (95%) | 37 (93%) | 0.37 |
Q3 | 33 (77%) | 96 (81%) | 34 (85%) | 0.63 |
Q4 | 27 (63%) | 63 (53%) | 29 (73%) | 0.07 |
Case C | ||||
Q1 | 20 (63%) | 102 (79%) | 34 (83%) | 0.10 |
Q2 | 8 (25%) | 65 (50%) | 20 (49%) | < 0.05 |
Q3 | 15 (47%) | 95 (74%) | 26 (63%) | < 0.05 |
Q4 | 17 (53%) | 64 (50%) | 24 (59%) | 0.60 |
Case D | ||||
Q1 | 35 (97%) | 129 (97%) | 33 (100%) | 0.40 |
Q2 | 2 (6%) | 24 (18%) | 12 (36%) | < 0.01 |
Q3 | 11 (31%) | 62 (47%) | 15 (45%) | 0.21 |
Q4 | 29 (81%) | 128 (96%) | 28 (85%) | < 0.01 |
Case E | ||||
Q1 | 35 (95%) | 127 (94%) | 29 (97%) | 0.84 |
Q2 | 17 (46%) | 85 (63%) | 24 (80%) | < 0.05 |
Q3 | 10 (27%) | 58 (43%) | 16 (53%) | 0.08 |
Q4 | 10 (27%) | 72 (53%) | 16 (53%) | < 0.05 |
Case F | ||||
Q1 | 32 (58%) | 94 (72%) | 13 (81%) | 0.10 |
Q2 | 37 (67%) | 97 (74%) | 13 (81%) | 0.46 |
Q3 | 11 (20%) | 31 (24%) | 5 (31%) | 0.64 |
Q4 | 19 (35%) | 76 (58%) | 11 (69%) | < 0.01 |
Case G | ||||
Q1 | 22 (92%) | 130 (98%) | 45 (98%) | 0.26 |
Q2 | 21 (88%) | 128 (97%) | 43 (93%) | 0.17 |
Q3 | 8 (33%) | 38 (29%) | 6 (13%) | 0.06 |
Q4 | 14 (58%) | 97 (73%) | 29 (63%) | 0.20 |
Case H | ||||
Q1 | 58 (97%) | 124 (100%) | 18 (100%) | 0.09 |
Q2 | 14 (23%) | 47 (38%) | 10 (56%) | < 0.05 |
Q3 | 28 (47%) | 84 (68%) | 13 (72%) | < 0.05 |
Q4 | 16 (27%) | 59 (48%) | 15 (83%) | < 0.01 |