Table 2 Learners knowledge of peer evaluation principles before the training and opinions about resources and course activities
Items of the questionnaire | Students (94.4% feedbacks, n = 68 under 72) | |
|---|---|---|
Principles of peer evaluation (PE) Students who … | knew the general principles | 20.6% (n = 14) |
knew principles applied to pedagogy | 13.2% (n = 9) | |
had pedagogical experience | 1.5% (n = 1) | |
Learning resources and course activities Students who … | struggled with IT tools | 16.2% (n = 11) |
found instructors explanations prior to the course not clear enough | 0% (n = 0) | |
found the period of time to produce the work too short | 1.5% (n = 1) | |
found reviewing work to be constraining | 22.1% (n = 15) | |
found the period of time to review peers works too short | 2.9% (n = 2) | |
found the number of works to review too important | 10.3% (n = 7) | |
found the scoring grid not well adapted | 19.1% (n = 13) | |