To examine the associations between medical students’ conceptions of learning, strategies to learning, and learning outcome in a medical humanities course
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|10 Jun 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Sep 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rajiv Mahajan|
|23 Sep 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ANURADHA JOSHI|
|14 Oct 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Yu-Chun Chiu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Oct 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Oct 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - ANURADHA JOSHI|
|24 Oct 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Yu-Chun Chiu|
|24 Oct 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rajiv Mahajan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Oct 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Oct 2019||Editorially accepted|
|8 Nov 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12909-019-1856-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.