Skip to main content

Table 2 Secondary outcomes

From: Effects of post-scenario debriefing versus stop-and-go debriefing in medical simulation training on skill acquisition and learning experience: a randomized controlled trial

Ā 

Post-scenario group

nā€‰=ā€‰24

Stop-and-Go group

nā€‰=ā€‰24

P-value

Question 1: ā€œI had the feeling that the feedback I received was a useful contribution to my learning experience.ā€

Median [quartiles (range)]

5 [5; 5 (4ā€“5)]

5 [5; 5 (4ā€“5)]

1.00

Question 2: ā€œI felt comfortable with the way that I received feedback.ā€

Median [quartiles (range)]

5 [5; 5 (4ā€“5)]

5 [5; 5 (4ā€“5)]

0.08

Question 3: ā€œThe feedback over my strengths was clear to me.ā€

Median [quartiles (range)]

5 [4; 5 (3ā€“5)]

5 [4; 5 (4ā€“5)]

0.29

Question 4: ā€œThe feedback over my points of improvement was clear to me.ā€

Median [quartiles (range)]

5 [5; 5 (4ā€“5)]

5 [5; 5 (4ā€“5)]

0.23

Question 5: ā€œMy stress level during the scenario was:ā€

Median [quartiles (range)]

3 [3; 4 (2ā€“4)]

3 [2; 3.5 (1ā€“4)]

0.21

  1. Questionnaire items assessed by Likert-type scale scores ranging from 1ā€‰=ā€‰completely disagree to 5ā€‰=ā€‰completely agree. For stress, 1 means that the participant experienced absolutely no stress and 5 represents maximum stress