Skip to main content

Table 4 Multiple regression analysis for the effect of curriculum on nursing students’ perceptions of community care

From: Influencing nursing students’ perceptions of community care with curriculum-redesign; a quasi-experimental cohort study

 

B

SE B

β

95% Confidence Interval

Step 1

 Constant

6.190

.052

 

6.089–6.291

 Curriculum

.015

.101

.006

−.183–.213

Step 2

 Constant

6.188

.052

 

6.086–6.289

 Curriculum

.009

.101

.004

−.190–.209

 Born outside the Netherlands

.119

.250

.019

−.372–.610

Step 3 a

 Constant

5.238

.487

 

4.282–6.194

 Curriculum

−.047

.098

−.019

−.240–.146

 Born outside the Netherlands

.000

.248

.000

−.487–.486

 Level of education

  secondary

Ref

Ref

Ref

Ref

  higher secondary

−.098

.126

−.031

−.344–.149

  professional

.227

.133

.074

−.033–.487

  other

.025

.376

.003

−.713–.763

 Sex (male)

−.116

.140

−.033

−.391–.159

 Age

.023

.022

.050

−.019–.066

 Belonging to church/ religious group

.263

.119

.086*

.030–.496

 Working/ has been working in CC

.558

.087

.249*

.387–.728

 Family or friends working in CC

.128

.087

.056

−.044–.300

 Receiving home care (or in family)

.087

.092

.037

−.094–.268

  1. Note. R2 = < .001 for Step 1; Δ R2 = < .001 for Step 2 (p < .05); ΔR2 = .098 for Step 3 (p < .05)
  2. *p < .05
  3. aIn the development of SCOPE, these factors were found to be potentially influential in students’ perceptions of community care [32, 33]