Proliferation of the WReN spider, an instrument to measure health professionals’ experience of research: a bibliographic study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Sep 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Feb 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ángel Borrego|
|19 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grant Lewison|
|26 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Lidia Luna Puerta|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grant Lewison|
|2 Jun 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ángel Borrego|
|27 Jun 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Lidia Luna Puerta|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Jul 2019||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jul 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12909-019-1693-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.