Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between perceived high status for eight different specialities and respondent’s own speciality choice

From: Swedish doctors choice of medical speciality and associations with cultural capital and perceived status: a cross-sectional study

Respondent’s own choice of specialty

High Status for:

Surgery

OR (95% CI)

Primary care

OR (95% CI)

Internal medicine

OR (95% CI)

Psychiatry

OR (95% CI)

Hospital-based service

OR (95% CI)

Primary care

Crude

Ref.

6.04 (1.91–19.15)

2.16 (0.60–7.72)

13.45 (3.46–52.27)

3.70 (0.75–18.26)

Adjusted

Ref.

7.46 (2.21–25.24)

2.39 (0.63–8.99)

18.21 (3.82–86.74)

5.40 (1.02–28.60)

Surgery

Crude

Ref.

0.40 (0.18–0.89)

0.29 (0.13–0.63)

0.14 (0.05–0.42)

0.39 (0.12–1.24)

Adjusted

Ref.

0.35 (0.15–0.84)

0.22 (0.09–0.52)

0.07 (0.02–0.29)

0.47 (0.13–1.80)

Geriatrics

Crude

Ref.

4.73 (0.95–23.61)

2.44 (0.43–13.78)

4.53 (0.59–34.46)

2.26 (0.19–26.43)

Adjusted

Ref.

5.28 (0.95–29.33)

2.16 (0.35–13.20)

4.92 (0.51–47.76)

4.00 (0.30–53.81)

Internal medicine

Crude

Ref.

4.65 (2.29–9.44)

1.86 (0.94–3.69)

3.35 (1.19–9.40)

1.55 (0.53–4.49)

Adjusted

Ref.

4.52 (2.13–9.60)

1.59 (0.76–3.32)

2.17 (0.66–7.13)

2.10 (0.65–6.83)

Psychiatry

Crude

Ref.

2.15 (0.49–9.35)

1.61 (0.35–7.46)

4.75 (0.88–25.71)

3.17 (0.49–20.52)

Adjusted

Ref.

2.19 (0.46–10.40)

1.47 (0.30–7.30)

5.21 (0.78–34.83)

4.42 (0.61–32.15)

Laboratory

Crude

Ref.

3.10 (0.77–12.52)

0.75 (0.12–4.62)

3.04 (0.47–19.72)

1.43 (0.14–14.62)

Adjusted

Ref.

3.78 (0.85–16.89)

0.83 (0.12–5.44)

3.67 (0.47–28.60)

2.28 (0.20–25.57)

Imaging/radiology

Crude

Ref.

0.83 (0.36–1.89)

0.49 (0.19–1.21)

0.67 (0.17–2.58)

1.02 (0.30–3.52)

Adjusted

Ref.

0.85 (0.35–2.03)

0.48 (0.19–1.25)

0.81 (0.19–3.47)

1.31 (0.35–4.89)

Neuro specialities

Crude

Ref.

4.49 (2.20–9.16)

1.65 (0.84–3.26)

2.80 (1.00–7.85)

2.55 (0.90–7.25)

Adjusted

Ref.

5.14 (2.35–11.27)

1.52 (0.73–3.18)

1.80 (0.54–6.06)

4.20 (1.25–14.10)

  1. The crude analyses are non-adjusted results between each of the ranked specialities and respondent’s own speciality compared with surgery as reference. Significant results; Primary care, Surgery, Internal medicine, Neuro specialities. Not significant: Geriatrics, Psychiatry, Laboratory, Imaging/radiology
  2. Adjusted for personality traits, age and gender
  3. Significant differences between respondent’s own speciality choice compared with surgery among the following outcomes: Primary care, Surgery, Internal medicine, Imaging/radiology, Neuro specialities. Not significant: Geriatrics, Psychiatry, Laboratory