From: Multi-material three dimensional printed models for simulation of bronchoscopy
Subjective rating items | |
Anatomical Accuracy Colour of the 3D printed model was similar to the endoscopic view of the real trachea | |
Material used to print the trachea accurately reflected real tissue properties | |
Endoscopic bronchial anatomy in the 3D printed model appeared similar to human anatomy | |
Clinical fidelity | |
Bronchial tree access was realistic on the 3D printed model 3D printed models accurately represented tracheal pathology | |
Manipulation of the flexible bronchoscope was realistic in the 3D printed model | |
Perceived usefulness I believe the 3D printed model is a useful tool for training basic bronchoscopic skills | |
Given the opportunity I would like to use the 3D printed model again for training/practicing/demonstrating bronchoscopic skills | |
I would recommend the 3D printed model as a tool for training/practicing/demonstrating bronchoscopic skills to colleagues/other trainees | |
Training on the 3D printed model is a valuable learning exercise | |
Open-ended response | |
What is the strength of 3D printed airway models? | |
How could the 3D printed airway models be improved? |