Skip to main content

Table 3 Student feedback (Median (IQR)

From: Effectiveness of SNAPPS for improving clinical reasoning in postgraduates: randomized controlled trial

Feedback parameters

SNAPPS group

Control group

P value*

Concisely covered all aspects of history taking

4 (4–4)

4 (2–4)

0.013

Performed all the steps of general examination

4 (4–4)

4 (3–4)

0.096

Systemic examination findings were relevant and in accordance with history

4 (3–4)

4 (4–4)

0.376

Sequencing and formulation of differential diagnosis were well organized

3 (2–3)

2 (2–3)

0.624

Hypothesis of differential diagnosis matching with history and examination

3 (2–4)

2 (2–4)

0.893

Able to speak out all the difficulties faced while case discussion

4 (4–4)

4 (3–4)

0.140

Narration of patient management plan – realistic and appropriate to differential diagnosis

3 (2–4)

3 (3–4)

0.601

Identified sufficient case based learning issues for self study

4 (4–4)

3 (2–4)

< 0.01

Time management during case presentations

3 (2–3)

3 (3–4)

0.057

Uniformity and skills of presentation

3 (3–3)

3 (3–4)

0.072

Overall rating of case presentation (Mean ± SD)

5.52 ± 1.58

5.48 ± 1.12

t = 0.099**

p = 0.921

  1. * Mann-Whitney U test
  2. ** Student t test