Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 5 Independent Factor Correlations

From: Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education

  Intervention Gender Examinations Refraction Hospital
VCDR 2–1 Correlation Coefficient −.042 .063 .166 .073 −.073
Sig. (2-tailed) .361 .176 .000 .114 .114
N 466 466 466 466 466
F-MCQ 2–1 Correlation Coefficient .007 .045 .094 −.001 −.010
Sig. (2-tailed) .872 .330 .043 .975 .836
N 466 466 466 466 466
MSE 2–1 Correlation Coefficient −0.19 .018 .089 −.146 .114
Sig. (2-tailed) .772 .782 .182 .027 .087
N 228 228 228 228 228
EOU 2–1 Correlation Coefficient .108 .057 −.090 −.065 .034
Sig. (2-tailed) .020 .222 .051 .164 .468
  1. VCDR – Vertical Cup Disc Ratio
  2. F-MCQ – Fundus Multiple Choice Question
  3. MSE – Model Slide Examination
  4. EOU – Ease of Use Score