Skip to main content

Table 5 Independent Factor Correlations

From: Does access to a portable ophthalmoscope improve skill acquisition in direct ophthalmoscopy? A method comparison study in undergraduate medical education

 

Intervention

Gender

Examinations

Refraction

Hospital

VCDR

2–1

Correlation Coefficient

−.042

.063

.166

.073

−.073

Sig. (2-tailed)

.361

.176

.000

.114

.114

N

466

466

466

466

466

F-MCQ

2–1

Correlation Coefficient

.007

.045

.094

−.001

−.010

Sig. (2-tailed)

.872

.330

.043

.975

.836

N

466

466

466

466

466

MSE

2–1

Correlation Coefficient

−0.19

.018

.089

−.146

.114

Sig. (2-tailed)

.772

.782

.182

.027

.087

N

228

228

228

228

228

EOU

2–1

Correlation Coefficient

.108

.057

−.090

−.065

.034

Sig. (2-tailed)

.020

.222

.051

.164

.468

  1. VCDR – Vertical Cup Disc Ratio
  2. F-MCQ – Fundus Multiple Choice Question
  3. MSE – Model Slide Examination
  4. EOU – Ease of Use Score