Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Correlation of different study resources utilized with OKAP Percentile

From: Resident and program characteristics that impact performance on the Ophthalmic Knowledge Assessment Program (OKAP)

Resource OKAP Percentile, Mean ± SD, (No. of Respondents) p-Value
Did Not Use Not At All Useful Slightly Useful Moderately Useful Extremely Useful
Review Books (e.g. Chern, Friedman) 60.5 ± 30.6 (51) 54.3 ± 30.0 (3) 63.5 ± 26.5 (42) 63.3 ± 23.9 (55) 63.7 ± 22.4 (26) 0.946
Basic Clinical science course (BCSC) books 57.7 ± 28.3 (19) 72.5 ± 27.1 (6) 55.9 ± 27.9 (52) 63.6 ± 24.3 (62) 69.3 ± 26.2 (38) 0.122
Question Books (e.g. ProVision, Mass Eye and Ear Review) 62.3 ± 27.0 (141) 26.0 ± 31.1 (2) 66.9 ± 22.6 (14) 67.7 ± 20.8 (13) 68.5 ± 27.6 (2) 0.308
Online Question Banks (e.g. OphthoQuestions.com) 59.6 ± 25.8 (5) N/A (0) 49.3 ± 31.4 (8) 49.9 ± 27.2 (43) 68.4 ± 23.7 (120) < 0.001
Group Study Sessions 60.2 ± 27.6 (107) 61.5 ± 21.4 (4) 71.8 ± 27.2 (25) 63.0 ± 19.0 (28) 68.0 ± 27.1 (10) 0.359
Review Sessions/Lectures by Program 47.1 ± 28.8 (13) 48.7 ± 28.8 (9) 55.4 ± 27.1 (65) 67.7 ± 24.0 (63) 77.7 ± 18.8 (26) < 0.001
Review Courses (e.g. Wills Eye, Osler, San Antonio) 63.6 ± 26.4 (128) 48.0 ± 11.5 (3) 60.8 ± 28.5 (14) 58.6 ± 24.1 (18) 66.3 ± 28.8 (12) 0.770