Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development of a checklist for evaluating psychiatric reports

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Nov 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nadine Dreimüller
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Nadine Dreimüller
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ndetei
7 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nancy McNaughton
10 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Nadine Dreimüller
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Dec 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nancy McNaughton
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
15 Apr 2019 Editorially accepted
2 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12909-019-1559-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement