Table 1 Students’ evaluation of user-friendliness of digital impressions. Response scale: 1 = “Do not agree at all”, 2 = “Rather don’t agree”, 3 = “Agree” to 4 = “Fully agree”. Md, median; IQR, interquartile range
Item | Md | IQR |
|---|---|---|
The time required to perform digital impression is satisfactory | 3.0 | 2.0–3.0 |
I feel that that digital impression is too time-consuming | 2.0 | 2.0–3.0 |
I am very satisfied with operating the intraoral camera | 3.0 | 2.0–3.0 |
The hand piece is too big for intraoral use | 2.0 | 2.0–3.0 |
The use of the powder was straightforward and fast | 3.0 | 3.0–4.0 |
I experienced the use of the powder as cumbersome | 2.0 | 1.0–3.0 |
I dealt well with operating the programme software | 3.0 | 3.0–4.0 |
Operation through the program was very complicated and time-consuming | 1.0 | 1.0–2.0 |
I am satisfied with the volume of the intraoral scanner | 4.0 | 3.75–4.0 |
I am satisfied with the presentation of the digital model on the monitor | 4.0 | 3.0–4.0 |
I am satisfied with the oral tolerance towards the handpiece | 3.0 | 3.0–4.0 |
I am satisfied with the oral tolerance towards the powder | 3.0 | 3.0–4.0 |