Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Disciplinary boundaries and integrating care: using Q-methodology to understand trainee views on being a good doctor

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Esther Muddiman
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Halah Ibrahim
18 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Edward Krupat
3 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Esther Muddiman
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Halah Ibrahim
14 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Esther Muddiman
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Esther Muddiman
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Feb 2019 Editorially accepted
15 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12909-019-1493-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement