Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Designing faculty development: lessons learnt from a qualitative interpretivist study exploring students’ expectations and experiences of clinical teaching

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Dec 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sam Leinster
10 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Esther de Groot
16 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Julia Blitz
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Esther de Groot
18 Dec 2018 Author responded Author comments - Julia Blitz
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Dec 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jan 2019 Author responded Author comments - Julia Blitz
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jan 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Jan 2019 Editorially accepted
7 Feb 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12909-019-1480-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement