Open Peer Review Reports for: The impact of an interprofessional training ward on the development of interprofessional competencies: study protocol of a longitudinal mixed-methods study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16 Feb 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 4 Jun 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanna Mink |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 4 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 14 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Flemming Jakobsen |
| 16 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Pitt |
| 20 Dec 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanna Mink |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 20 Dec 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 21 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Pitt |
| 22 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Flemming Jakobsen |
| 28 Jan 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Johanna Mink |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 28 Jan 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 29 Jan 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Feb 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-019-1478-1 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
