Perception of the usability and implementation of a metacognitive mnemonic to check cognitive errors in clinical setting
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|24 Jul 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Aug 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - T Chan|
|24 Sep 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Sep 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Oct 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Keng Sheng Chew|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Oct 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Dec 2018||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jan 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12909-018-1451-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.